From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mu8b5-0004HB-Ll for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:40:44 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mu8b0-00048l-0f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:40:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57460 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mu8az-00048M-GI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:40:37 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f188.google.com ([209.85.222.188]:48630) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mu8az-0001jb-5d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:40:37 -0400 Received: by pzk26 with SMTP id 26so1702540pzk.4 for ; Sat, 03 Oct 2009 10:40:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20091003173252.1061.qmail@stuge.se> References: <4AC4A487.1050003@us.ibm.com> <4AC51DBA.7020609@codemonkey.ws> <2a50f7880910011741k65ac8dfbq2fc8c9f58f5fa8d9@mail.gmail.com> <4AC60037.6000001@codemonkey.ws> <2a50f7880910020958g3fe5eadehe5e5094c05b218d9@mail.gmail.com> <4AC64A5C.6010003@gmx.net> <4AC64C32.4020509@codemonkey.ws> <4AC67326.6080603@gmx.net> <20091003150803.GF17326@redhat.com> <20091003173252.1061.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 10:40:35 -0700 Message-ID: <13426df10910031040y5029dc31m8c6ca4a4bac098a6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [coreboot] [Qemu-devel] Release plan for 0.12.0 From: ron minnich Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gleb Natapov , Carl-Daniel Hailfinger , Anthony Liguori , Coreboot , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, ron minnich , Anthony Liguori , Jordan Justen I use qemu for a lot of coreboot work. I really depend on qemu for many things I do, not just coreboot related. The qemu target in coreboot has been very heavily used by us to test out new ideas. That said, I don't see a compelling need to augment seabios with coreboot on qemu *in the standard distribution*. If seabios gets the job done, and gets OSes booted, I think that's sufficient. I don't see a need to complicate anyone's life with something that is, after all, a sideshow for qemu users. Conversely, I don't see the need to add the huge pile of stuff that comes with UEFI/OVMF/whatever to qemu either. One might argue that having any BIOS callbacks in the OS is a huge mistake, and certainly I've learned in practice that this argument is true. thanks ron