From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55839) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4q2g-0007vC-Gc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:19:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4q2b-0001aM-Pp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:19:02 -0400 Received: from qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.16]:37608) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4q2b-0001aD-JO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:18:57 -0400 From: Matthew Ogilvie Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 03:13:56 -0600 Message-Id: <1345799636-9115-4-git-send-email-mmogilvi_qemu@miniinfo.net> In-Reply-To: <1345799636-9115-1-git-send-email-mmogilvi_qemu@miniinfo.net> References: <503714B0.1020404@web.de> <1345799636-9115-1-git-send-email-mmogilvi_qemu@miniinfo.net> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] doc: mention that -no-spurious-interrupt-hack doesn't work with KVM List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Jan Kiszka , Matthew Ogilvie Signed-off-by: Matthew Ogilvie --- On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 07:40:36AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Has to mention or even actively warn that it doesn't work with KVM and > its in-kernel irqchip (as that PIC model lacks your hack). qemu-options.hx | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/qemu-options.hx b/qemu-options.hx index b28e853..d6bfc34 100644 --- a/qemu-options.hx +++ b/qemu-options.hx @@ -1198,7 +1198,8 @@ STEXI Use it as a workaround for operating systems that drive PICs in a way that can generate spurious interrupts, but the OS doesn't handle spurious interrupts gracefully. (e.g. late 80s/early 90s versions of ATT UNIX -and derivatives) +and derivatives) Warning: This does not work with KVM's in-kernel +PIC model. ETEXI HXCOMM Deprecated by -rtc -- 1.7.10.2.484.gcd07cc5