From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Richard Davies <richard@arachsys.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
QEMU-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Reduce compaction scanning and lock contention
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:46:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1348224383-1499-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> (raw)
Hi Andrew,
Richard Davies and Shaohua Li have both reported lock contention
problems in compaction on the zone and LRU locks as well as
significant amounts of time being spent in compaction. This series
aims to reduce lock contention and scanning rates to reduce that CPU
usage. Richard reported at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/21/91 that
this series made a big different to a problem he reported in August
(http://marc.info/?l=kvm&m=134511507015614&w=2).
Patches 1-3 reverts existing patches in Andrew's tree that get replaced
later in the series.
Patch 4 is a fix for c67fe375 (mm: compaction: Abort async compaction if
locks are contended or taking too long) to properly abort in all
cases when contention is detected.
Patch 5 defers acquiring the zone->lru_lock as long as possible.
Patch 6 defers acquiring the zone->lock as lock as possible.
Patch 7 reverts Rik's "skip-free" patches as the core concept gets
reimplemented later and the remaining patches are easier to
understand if this is reverted first.
Patch 8 adds a pageblock-skip bit to the pageblock flags to cache what
pageblocks should be skipped by the migrate and free scanners.
This drastically reduces the amount of scanning compaction has
to do.
Patch 9 reimplements something similar to Rik's idea except it uses the
pageblock-skip information to decide where the scanners should
restart from and does not need to wrap around.
I tested this on 3.6-rc6 + linux-next/akpm. Kernels tested were
akpm-20120920 3.6-rc6 + linux-next/akpm as of Septeber 20th, 2012
lesslock Patches 1-6
revert Patches 1-7
cachefail Patches 1-8
skipuseless Patches 1-9
Stress high-order allocation tests looked ok. Success rates are more or
less the same with the full series applied but there is an expectation that
there is less opportunity to race with other allocation requests if there is
less scanning. The time to complete the tests did not vary that much and are
uninteresting as were the vmstat statistics so I will not present them here.
Using ftrace I recorded how much scanning was done by compaction and got this
3.6.0-rc6 3.6.0-rc6 3.6.0-rc6 3.6.0-rc6 3.6.0-rc6
akpm-20120920 lockless revert-v2r2 cachefail skipuseless
Total free scanned 360753976 515414028 565479007 17103281 18916589
Total free isolated 2852429 3597369 4048601 670493 727840
Total free efficiency 0.0079% 0.0070% 0.0072% 0.0392% 0.0385%
Total migrate scanned 247728664 822729112 1004645830 17946827 14118903
Total migrate isolated 2555324 3245937 3437501 616359 658616
Total migrate efficiency 0.0103% 0.0039% 0.0034% 0.0343% 0.0466%
The efficiency is worthless because of the nature of the test and the
number of failures. The really interesting point as far as this patch
series is concerned is the number of pages scanned. Note that reverting
Rik's patches massively increases the number of pages scanned indicating
that those patches really did make a difference to CPU usage.
However, caching what pageblocks should be skipped has a much higher
impact. With patches 1-8 applied, free page and migrate page scanning are
both reduced by 95% in comparison to the akpm kernel. If the basic concept
of Rik's patches are implemened on top then scanning then the free scanner
barely changed but migrate scanning was further reduced. That said, tests
on 3.6-rc5 indicated that the last patch had greater impact than what was
measured here so it is a bit variable.
One way or the other, this series has a large impact on the amount of
scanning compaction does when there is a storm of THP allocations.
include/linux/mmzone.h | 5 +-
include/linux/pageblock-flags.h | 19 +-
mm/compaction.c | 397 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
mm/internal.h | 11 +-
mm/page_alloc.c | 6 +-
5 files changed, 280 insertions(+), 158 deletions(-)
--
1.7.9.2
next reply other threads:[~2012-09-21 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-21 10:46 Mel Gorman [this message]
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] Revert "mm: compaction: check lock contention first before taking lock" Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:46 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/9] Revert "mm-compaction-abort-compaction-loop-if-lock-is-contended-or-run-too-long-fix" Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:47 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] Revert "mm: compaction: abort compaction loop if lock is contended or run too long" Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:48 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/9] mm: compaction: Abort compaction loop if lock is contended or run too long Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:50 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 21:31 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-25 7:34 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] mm: compaction: Acquire the zone->lru_lock as late as possible Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:51 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-25 7:05 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 7:51 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25 8:13 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 21:39 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-26 0:23 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-26 10:17 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/9] mm: compaction: Acquire the zone->lock " Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:52 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-24 8:52 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25 7:36 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-25 7:35 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/9] Revert "mm: have order > 0 compaction start off where it left" Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:52 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-25 7:37 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] mm: compaction: Cache if a pageblock was scanned and no pages were isolated Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:53 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 21:36 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-24 9:39 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-24 21:26 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-25 9:12 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-25 20:03 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-27 12:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mm: compaction: cache if a pageblock was scanned and no pages were isolated -fix2 Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 13:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] mm: compaction: Cache if a pageblock was scanned and no pages were isolated Mel Gorman
2012-09-26 0:49 ` Minchan Kim
2012-09-27 12:14 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 10:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 9/9] mm: compaction: Restart compaction from near where it left off Mel Gorman
2012-09-21 17:54 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-09-21 13:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Reduce compaction scanning and lock contention Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1348224383-1499-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard@arachsys.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).