From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THJHO-00089E-B3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:57:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1THJHI-0003Qg-J5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:57:46 -0400 From: Stefan Weil Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:57:38 +0200 Message-Id: <1348772258-31168-1-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] slirp: Fix spelling in comment (enought -> enough, insure -> ensure) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org Cc: Jan Kiszka , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Weil Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil --- As a non native speaker, I feel that 'ensure' is better here than 'insure'. Could a native speaker please confirm that? Thanks, Stefan slirp/ip_icmp.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/slirp/ip_icmp.h b/slirp/ip_icmp.h index 1a1af91..be4426b 100644 --- a/slirp/ip_icmp.h +++ b/slirp/ip_icmp.h @@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ struct icmp { /* * Lower bounds on packet lengths for various types. - * For the error advice packets must first insure that the - * packet is large enought to contain the returned ip header. + * For the error advice packets must first ensure that the + * packet is large enough to contain the returned ip header. * Only then can we do the check to see if 64 bits of packet * data have been returned, since we need to check the returned * ip header length. -- 1.7.10