From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: blauwirbel@gmail.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] exec: Do not use absolute address hints for code_gen_buffer with -fpie
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:30:12 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1350372614-30041-4-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350372614-30041-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net>
The hard-coded addresses inside alloc_code_gen_buffer only make sense
if we're building an executable that will actually run at the address
we've put into the linker scripts.
When we're building with -fpie, the executable will run at some
random location chosen by the kernel. We get better placement for
the code_gen_buffer if we allow the kernel to place the memory,
as it will tend to to place it near the executable, based on the
PROT_EXEC bit.
Since code_gen_prologue is always inside the executable, this effect
is easily seen at the end of most TB, with the exit_tb opcode, and
with any calls to helper functions.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
---
exec.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
index 6c0b2d7..5e33a3d 100644
--- a/exec.c
+++ b/exec.c
@@ -578,7 +578,12 @@ static inline void *alloc_code_gen_buffer(void)
/* Constrain the position of the buffer based on the host cpu.
Note that these addresses are chosen in concert with the
addresses assigned in the relevant linker script file. */
-# if defined(__x86_64__) && defined(MAP_32BIT)
+# if defined(__PIE__) || defined(__PIC__)
+ /* Don't bother setting a preferred location if we're building
+ a position-independent executable. We're more likely to get
+ an address near the main executable if we let the kernel
+ choose the address. */
+# elif defined(__x86_64__) && defined(MAP_32BIT)
/* Force the memory down into low memory with the executable.
Leave the choice of exact location with the kernel. */
flags |= MAP_32BIT;
--
1.7.11.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-16 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-16 7:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/5] Better allocation of code_gen_buffer Richard Henderson
2012-10-16 7:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] exec: Split up and tidy code_gen_buffer Richard Henderson
2012-10-16 7:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] exec: Don't make DEFAULT_CODE_GEN_BUFFER_SIZE too large Richard Henderson
2012-10-16 7:30 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2012-11-18 20:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] exec: Do not use absolute address hints for code_gen_buffer with -fpie Stefan Weil
2012-11-19 16:27 ` Richard Henderson
2012-10-16 7:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] exec: Allocate code_gen_prologue from code_gen_buffer Richard Henderson
2012-10-16 7:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] exec: Make MIN_CODE_GEN_BUFFER_SIZE private to exec.c Richard Henderson
2012-10-20 8:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/5] Better allocation of code_gen_buffer Blue Swirl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1350372614-30041-4-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net \
--to=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).