From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37549)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <hdegoede@redhat.com>) id 1TTxOS-00073k-RJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:13:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <hdegoede@redhat.com>) id 1TTxOR-0004zX-Pj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:13:20 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37217)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <hdegoede@redhat.com>) id 1TTxOR-0004zC-G5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:13:19 -0400
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA1GDIum021216
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:13:18 -0400
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Date: Thu,  1 Nov 2012 17:15:00 +0100
Message-Id: <1351786506-17329-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] usb: split packet result into actual_length + status v3
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Here is v3 of the split packet result into actual_length + status patchset.

Changes in v2:
As requested this version makes sb_handle_packet and
the device's handle_control and handle_data methods return void, to
make the sync/async packet handling more alike.

Changes in v3:
-Rebased on latest usb-next tree
-Added a patch to change how combined packets are freed, based on review
 comments

Regards,

Hans