Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] target-i386:slightly refactor dr7 related function

[li guang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>]

在 2012-12-06四的 09:23 +0000，Peter Maydell写道：
> On 6 December 2012 09:16, li guang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > 在 2012-12-06四的 08:54 +0000，Peter Maydell写道：
> >> On 6 December 2012 03:03, liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >> > Signed-off-by: liguang <lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >> > --- a/target-i386/seg_helper.c
> >> > +++ b/target-i386/seg_helper.c
> >> > @@ -465,9 +465,9 @@ static void switch_tss(CPUX86State *env, int tss_selector,
> >> >
> >> >  #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> >> >      /* reset local breakpoints */
> >> > -    if (env->dr[7] & 0x55) {
> >> > -        for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> >> > -            if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i) == 0x1) {
> >> > +    if (env->dr[7] & DR7_LOCAL_BP_MASK) {
> >> > +        for (i = 0; i < DR7_MAX_BP; i++) {
> >> > +            if (hw_breakpoint_enabled(env->dr[7], i)) {
> >> >                  hw_breakpoint_remove(env, i);
> >> >              }
> >> >          }
> >>
> >> This is still wrong.
> >
> > do you mean the use of 'hw_breakpoint_enabled'? or others?
> > maybe a mistake, I change it to 'hw_local_breakpoint_enabled'.
> > if it is I'll re-send a corrected patch.
> 
> I mean that in the comments on the previous version of this
> patchseet we explained that this check is specifically checking
> for whether the breakpoint is enabled locally, and that your
> change to just returning bool broke this. And in this version
> of the patch there is still exactly the same problem.

why broke?
this function just ask if breakpoint 'i' was enable,
so we answer enabled or not? 2 simple cases, any problem?

> 
> -- PMM

-- 
regards!
li guang