From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37833) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiDC1-0004kR-TU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:55:28 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiDBz-0006xu-A4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:55:25 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:40:00 -0600 From: Scott Wood References: <1354974282-1915-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1354974282-1915-3-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1355182459.5334.17@snotra> In-Reply-To: <1355182459.5334.17@snotra> (from scottwood@freescale.com on Mon Dec 10 17:34:19 2012) Message-ID: <1355182800.5334.18@snotra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; delsp=Yes; format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 02/19] mpic: Unify numbering scheme List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Scott Wood Cc: "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org List" , Alexander Graf , qemu-devel qemu-devel On 12/10/2012 05:34:19 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 12/08/2012 07:44:25 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> /* Interrupt definitions */ >> -#define MPIC_EXT_IRQ 0 >> -#define MPIC_INT_IRQ (MPIC_EXT_IRQ + MPIC_MAX_EXT) >> -#define MPIC_TMR_IRQ (MPIC_INT_IRQ + MPIC_MAX_INT) >> -#define MPIC_MSG_IRQ (MPIC_TMR_IRQ + MPIC_MAX_TMR) >> -#define MPIC_MSI_IRQ (MPIC_MSG_IRQ + MPIC_MAX_MSG) >> -#define MPIC_IPI_IRQ (MPIC_MSI_IRQ + MPIC_MAX_MSI) >> +/* IRQs, accessible through the IRQ region */ >> +#define MPIC_EXT_IRQ 0x00 >> +#define MPIC_INT_IRQ 0x10 >> +#define MPIC_MSG_IRQ 0xb0 >> +#define MPIC_MSI_IRQ 0xe0 >=20 > Where are MPIC_EXT/INT/MSG/MSI_IRQ used now? Note that these are > specific to Freescale's MPIC. >=20 >> +/* These are available through separate regions, but >> + for simplicity's sake mapped into the same number space */ >> +#define MPIC_TMR_IRQ 0xf3 >> +#define MPIC_IPI_IRQ 0xfb >=20 > Please don't do this, or at least choose different numbers. 0xf3 is a > valid MSI on p4080 (not to mention T4240 which goes beyond 256). >=20 > Again, what uses these defines? Is it something later in the series? OK, the TMR/IPI are used by existing code that this patch doesn't =20 remove, but I think that's not the case with EXT/INT/MSG/MSI. -Scott=