From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57994)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <B07421@freescale.com>) id 1TjaJQ-00085m-JF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:48:48 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <B07421@freescale.com>) id 1TjaJO-0001Mt-1R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:48:44 -0500
Received: from co9ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com ([207.46.163.26]:15614
	helo=co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <B07421@freescale.com>) id 1TjaJN-0001Mn-OL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:48:41 -0500
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:48:34 -0600
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
In-Reply-To: <50CADE3B.9010906@redhat.com> (from kraxel@redhat.com on Fri
	Dec 14 02:07:23 2012)
Message-ID: <1355510914.4740.3@snotra>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; delsp=Yes; format=Flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] Allow building without graphics support
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 12/14/2012 02:07:23 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>  Hi,
>=20
> > No, they are with prefix, just not in $PATH.  I have more than one
> > "powerpc-linux-gnu" toolchain and I don't want to mess with my $PATH
> > constantly to choose between them.
>=20
> # ls -l /usr/bin/*-gcc
> -rwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 264112 Aug 23  2011 =20
> /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-gcc
> -rwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 268216 Oct 18 18:24 =20
> /usr/bin/x86_64-redhat-linux-gcc
>=20
> I think the second part ("pc" / "redhat") can be choosen pretty freely
> when building gcc, so you could name your cross compilers differently,
> then have them in PATH and pick by name instead of typing full paths.

For the most part I don't build these toolchains, so that's not an =20
option.  Plus, I like having each toolchain fully contained in its own =20
directory.  And this worked fine before pixman.

> > No, it's real name is
> > =20
> /home/scott/fsl/tc/gcc-4.5.55-eglibc-2.11.55/powerpc-linux-gnu/bin/powerp=
c-linux-gnu-gcc
>=20
> ./configure
> --cross-prefix=3D/home/scott/fsl/tc/gcc-4.5.55-eglibc-2.11.55/powerpc-lin=
ux-gnu/bin/powerpc-linux-gnu-
> && make ?

A few more options than that, but basically yes.

I can get past this particular obstacle by doing something like:

(PATH=3D/home/scott/.../powerpc-linux-gnu/bin:"$PATH" ./configure =20
--cross-prefix=3Dpowerpc-linu-gnu- ...)
and then
(PATH=3D/home/scott/.../powerpc-linux-gnu/bin:"$PATH" make)

...but then I run into the problem that --extra-cflags and =20
--extra-ldflags don't get passed into pixman.

-Scott=