qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, libvir-list@redhat.com,
	"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	"Jiri Denemark" <jdenemar@redhat.com>,
	"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/9] target-i386: check/enforce: Check SVM flag support as well
Date: Fri,  4 Jan 2013 13:37:41 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1357313864-31026-7-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1357313864-31026-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>

When nested SVM is supported, the kernel returns the SVM flag on
GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID[1], so we can check the SVM flag safely on
kvm_check_features_against_host().

I don't know why the original code ignored the SVM flag. Maybe it was
because kvm_cpu_fill_host() used the CPUID instruction directly instead
of GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID

[1] Older kernels (before v2.6.37) returned the SVM flag even if nested
    SVM was _not_ supported. So the only cases where this patch should
    change behavior is when SVM is being requested by the user or the
    CPU model, but not supported by the host. And on these cases we
    really want QEMU to abort if the "enforce" option is set.

Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
---
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com
Cc: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

I'm CCing libvirt people in case having SVM enabled by default may cause
trouble when libvirt starts using the "enforce" flag. I don't know if
libvirt expects most of the QEMU CPU models to have nested SVM enabled.
---
 target-i386/cpu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
index 13075c7..21aceed 100644
--- a/target-i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
@@ -969,7 +969,7 @@ static int kvm_check_features_against_host(x86_def_t *guest_def)
         {&guest_def->ext2_features, &host_def.ext2_features,
             ~0, ext2_feature_name, 0x80000001, R_EDX},
         {&guest_def->ext3_features, &host_def.ext3_features,
-            ~CPUID_EXT3_SVM, ext3_feature_name, 0x80000001, R_ECX}};
+            ~0, ext3_feature_name, 0x80000001, R_ECX}};
 
     assert(kvm_enabled());
 
-- 
1.7.11.7

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-04 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-04 15:37 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] target-i386: make "enforce" flag work as it should Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 15:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] target-i386: kvm: -cpu host: Use GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID for SVM features Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 15:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/9] target-i386: kvm: Enable all supported KVM features for -cpu host Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 15:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] target-i386: check/enforce: Fix CPUID leaf numbers on error messages Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 20:54   ` Blue Swirl
2013-01-04 15:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/9] target-i386: check/enforce: Do not ignore "hypervisor" flag Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 15:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] target-i386: check/enforce: Check all CPUID.80000001H.EDX bits Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 15:37 ` Eduardo Habkost [this message]
2013-01-04 15:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/9] target-i386: check/enforce: Eliminate check_feat field Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 15:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] target-i386: Call kvm_check_features_against_host() only if CONFIG_KVM is set Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 15:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 9/9] target-i386: check/enforce: Check all feature words Eduardo Habkost
     [not found] ` <201301042020.r04KKv0R014816@d01av02.pok.ibm.com>
2013-01-04 20:48   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] target-i386: make "enforce" flag work as it should Eduardo Habkost
2013-01-04 21:10     ` Anthony Liguori
2013-01-04 21:00 ` Anthony Liguori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1357313864-31026-7-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --to=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=jdenemar@redhat.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).