From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
ehabkost@redhat.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qdev: Don't assume existence of parent bus on unparenting
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:34:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1357320880-10782-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> (raw)
Commit 667d22d1ae59da46b4c1fbd094ca61145f19b8c3 (qdev: move bus removal
to object_unparent) made the assumption that at unparenting time
parent_bus is not NULL. This assumption is unjustified since
object_unparent() may well be called directly after object_initialize(),
without any qdev_set_parent_bus().
This did not cause any issues yet because qdev_[try_]create() does call
qdev_set_parent_bus(), falling back to SysBus if unsupplied.
While at it, ensure that this new function uses the device_ prefix and
make the name more neutral in light of this semantic change.
Reported-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
Planning to insert this before the final CPU-as-a-device patch on qom-cpu,
to avoid a regression for, e.g., -cpu Haswell,enforce if unsupported by host.
This supersedes my cosmetic patch in the "QOM realize, device-only" series:
v1 -> v2:
* Make bus removal conditional on parent bus
* Rename function further
hw/qdev.c | 8 +++++---
1 Datei geändert, 5 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 3 Zeilen entfernt(-)
diff --git a/hw/qdev.c b/hw/qdev.c
index f2c2484..e2a5c57 100644
--- a/hw/qdev.c
+++ b/hw/qdev.c
@@ -698,16 +698,18 @@ static void device_class_base_init(ObjectClass *class, void *data)
klass->props = NULL;
}
-static void qdev_remove_from_bus(Object *obj)
+static void device_unparent(Object *obj)
{
DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(obj);
- bus_remove_child(dev->parent_bus, dev);
+ if (dev->parent_bus != NULL) {
+ bus_remove_child(dev->parent_bus, dev);
+ }
}
static void device_class_init(ObjectClass *class, void *data)
{
- class->unparent = qdev_remove_from_bus;
+ class->unparent = device_unparent;
}
void device_reset(DeviceState *dev)
--
1.7.10.4
next reply other threads:[~2013-01-04 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-04 17:34 Andreas Färber [this message]
2013-01-07 13:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qdev: Don't assume existence of parent bus on unparenting Igor Mammedov
2013-01-07 14:02 ` Andreas Färber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1357320880-10782-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).