From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47441) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrEDH-0008JL-VC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:50:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrEDE-0000Hw-0y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:49:59 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 14:49:32 -0600 From: Scott Wood References: <1356142552-13453-1-git-send-email-scottwood@freescale.com> <1356142552-13453-7-git-send-email-scottwood@freescale.com> <1357254439.22404.14@snotra> In-Reply-To: (from blauwirbel@gmail.com on Fri Jan 4 14:46:00 2013) Message-ID: <1357332572.666.19@snotra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; delsp=Yes; format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 06/15] openpic: rework critical interrupt support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 01/04/2013 02:46:00 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Scott Wood =20 > wrote: > > It looks like one of the adjustments was wrapping an error string =20 > -- does > > QEMU not follow the Linux rule of not wrapping error strings? If =20 > not, maybe > > that should change. >=20 > There was some discussion earlier and IIRC the outcome was that error > strings should contain unique IDs to make them greppable. Sigh. Are there any examples of this being done? How is uniqueness =20 ensured? -Scott=