From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54884)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <B07421@freescale.com>) id 1TrEli-0003zC-Ub
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:25:38 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <B07421@freescale.com>) id 1TrElg-00041c-5r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:25:34 -0500
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 15:25:20 -0600
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
References: <1356142552-13453-1-git-send-email-scottwood@freescale.com>
	<1356142552-13453-7-git-send-email-scottwood@freescale.com>
	<FAFF6190-70E3-496D-A3A6-FAC90FE62AF8@suse.de>
	<1357254439.22404.14@snotra>
	<CAAu8pHv+pr+Tx1Xi8uxYfUBUTQ4=dmjX+5KW87uR+QKHJBMApQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<1357332572.666.19@snotra>
	<CAAu8pHvndO4p+YYro3yJrsLBuJVQ9TvVOkXHA459NjZLVyYp0Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAu8pHvndO4p+YYro3yJrsLBuJVQ9TvVOkXHA459NjZLVyYp0Q@mail.gmail.com>
	(from blauwirbel@gmail.com on Fri Jan  4 15:17:21 2013)
Message-ID: <1357334720.666.20@snotra>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; delsp=Yes; format=Flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 06/15] openpic: rework critical
 interrupt support
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 01/04/2013 03:17:21 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com> =20
> wrote:
> > On 01/04/2013 02:46:00 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Scott Wood =20
> <scottwood@freescale.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > It looks like one of the adjustments was wrapping an error =20
> string --
> >> > does
> >> > QEMU not follow the Linux rule of not wrapping error strings?  =20
> If not,
> >> > maybe
> >> > that should change.
> >>
> >> There was some discussion earlier and IIRC the outcome was that =20
> error
> >> strings should contain unique IDs to make them greppable.
> >
> >
> > Sigh.  Are there any examples of this being done?  How is uniqueness
> > ensured?
>=20
> Here's one example:
> http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/73final/6023/6023pro_001.html
>=20
> :-)

I meant in QEMU. :-P

-Scott=