qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Krishna J <krishnamurthyjs@outlook.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/4] MSI affinity for assigned devices
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 13:52:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1357591921.11324.149.camel@ul30vt.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DUB002-W107A033A11B2888AD211F1CAE250@phx.gbl>

On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 20:14 +0000, Krishna J wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> > MSI routing updates aren't currently handled by pci-assign or
> > vfio-pci (when using KVM acceleration), which means that trying to
> > set interrupt SMP affinity in the guest has no effect unless MSI is
> > completely disabled and re-enabled.  This series fixes this for both
> > device assignment backends using similar schemes.  We store the last
> > MSIMessage programmed to KVM and do updates to the MSI route when it
> > changes.  pci-assign takes a little bit of refactoring to make this
> > happen cleanly.  Thanks,
> 
> I am using the MSI affinity for assigned devices patch 1 to 4. I have
> setup the guest such that VCPU0 is pinned to PCPU1, VCPU1 is pinned to
> PCPU2, VCPU2 is pinned to PCPU3 and VCPU3 is pinned to PCPU4. I do
> this by taskset after the guest boots. I then start generating
> interrupts affined to VCPU3. I see all the interrupts directly
> delivered to VCPU 3. Now i do the same test but interrupt affined to
> VCPU 2. Although the interrupts are delivered to VCPU2  there are lot
> of "Rescheduling interrupts" in VCPU 3. I have checked the
> smp_affinity and it is updated to VCPU 2. 
> Wanted to know your feedback on this usecase and what might be the
> impact. 
>            CPU0       CPU1	 CPU2       CPU3
>   0:        211          0          0          0   IO-APIC-edge      timer
>   4:	   60940          0          0          0   IO-APIC-edge      serial
>   8:         65          0          0          0   IO-APIC-edge      rtc0
>   9:          0          0          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi
>  40:          0          0          0          0   PCI-MSI-edge      virtio1-config
>  41:	    1910          0          0          0   PCI-MSI-edge      virtio1-requests
>  42:          0          0          0          0   PCI-MSI-edge      virtio0-config
>  43:        127          0          0          0   PCI-MSI-edge      virtio0-input
>  44:          1          0          0          0   PCI-MSI-edge      virtio0-output
>  45:          1          0       3377      11194   PCI-MSI-edge      FPGA_DEV
> NMI:          0          0          0          0   Non-maskable interrupts
> LOC:     225880     231572     223670     223612   Local timer interrupts
> SPU:          0          0          0          0   Spurious interrupts
> PMI:          0          0          0          0   Performance monitoring interrupts
> IWI:          0          0          0          0   IRQ work interrupts
> RTR:          0          0          0          0   APIC ICR read retries
> RES:         14         20         21       3398   Rescheduling interrupts-------> Many RES Interrtups!!!!!!
> CAL:          0         14         14         16   Function call interrupts
> TLB:          0          0          0          0   TLB shootdowns

I don't know, but I'll fix the line wrap for anyone else that wants to
have a look.  The count looks roughly similar to the number of
interrupts to VCPU2.  Is your application somehow tied to VCPU3?
Thanks,

Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-07 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-27 22:00 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/4] MSI affinity for assigned devices Alex Williamson
2012-11-27 22:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/4] kvm: Stub kvm_irqchip_update_msi_route Alex Williamson
2012-11-27 22:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/4] vfio-pci: Add support for MSI affinity Alex Williamson
2012-11-27 22:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/4] pci-assign: Refactor MSI virq array Alex Williamson
2012-11-27 22:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 4/4] pci-assign: Add MSI affinity support Alex Williamson
2012-11-27 23:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/4] MSI affinity for assigned devices Jan Kiszka
2012-11-27 23:21   ` Alex Williamson
2012-11-29  6:57     ` Jan Kiszka
2012-11-28 16:32 ` [Qemu-devel] PCI device pass through support Krishna J
2012-11-28 17:00   ` Alex Williamson
2013-01-07 20:14 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/4] MSI affinity for assigned devices Krishna J
2013-01-07 20:52   ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2013-01-07 21:22     ` Krishna J

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1357591921.11324.149.camel@ul30vt.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=krishnamurthyjs@outlook.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).