From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFJcX-0000qJ-Vs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 04:00:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFJcN-0008Nx-7N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 03:59:53 -0400 Received: from e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.107]:45761) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VFJcM-0008Nd-V4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 03:59:43 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp11.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:52:46 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD7F1B0805F for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:59:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.252]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r7U7xPaA62128304 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:59:25 GMT Received: from d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r7U7xaQh006358 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 01:59:36 -0600 From: Cornelia Huck Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:59:31 +0200 Message-Id: <1377849572-42883-1-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390-ccw: Fix ipl failure. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Cornelia Huck , Christian Borntraeger , qemu-devel , Dominik Dingel Hi Alex, here's a simple patch that makes starting from a dataplane-backed device on a fast LPAR work for me. I make some assumptions on the host behaviour, but I think it's fine for that very simple implementation (and it certainly works better than before :) Could you either take or ack this patch? I can also prepare a pull request. Cornelia Huck (1): s390-ccw.img: Fix waiting for virtio processing. pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c | 10 +++++++--- pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 1.8.3.4