From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42135)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1VGlG1-0004SK-J7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 03:42:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1VGlFt-00038y-7C
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 03:42:37 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:17900)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1VGlFt-00038e-00
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 03:42:29 -0400
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r837gRfw019342
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 03:42:27 -0400
Message-ID: <1378194145.3618.9.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org>
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 09:42:25 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1378129292-13229-1-git-send-email-cfergeau@redhat.com>
References: <1378129292-13229-1-git-send-email-cfergeau@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2] spice-core: Use g_strdup_printf instead
 of snprintf
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mo, 2013-09-02 at 15:41 +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> Several places in spice-core.c were using either g_malloc+snprintf
> or snprintf+g_strdup to achieve the same result as g_strdup_printf.

Added to spice patch queue.

thanks,
  Gerd