From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54335) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VGtDl-00030L-LS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 12:12:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VGtDf-0008Ue-BQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 12:12:49 -0400 Message-ID: <1378224760.3246.45.camel@ul30vt.home> From: Alex Williamson Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:12:40 -0600 In-Reply-To: References: <1378196857-27541-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <5225AC9A.2090601@ozlabs.ru> <5225BD32.8030001@siemens.com> <52260025.3050704@ozlabs.ru> <5226048E.2090004@ozlabs.ru> <1378223912.3246.36.camel@ul30vt.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-headers: update to 3.11 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: kvm-devel , Gleb Natapov , Alexey Kardashevskiy , Jan Kiszka , Michael Tokarev , QEMU Developers , QEMU Trivial , Paolo Bonzini On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 17:03 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 3 September 2013 16:58, Alex Williamson wrote: > > I was under the impression that we were only ever updating linux-headers > > from mainline, never from kvm-next. > > Looking at the git history, it's variable. Four of the > last 10 updates were from somewhere other than mainline. > In any case this is the kind of policy decision that > means updates should go via the QEMU KVM maintainers :-) Seems like every update except ppc has come from mainline. Personally, I don't think it makes sense anymore. QEMU has scope beyond KVM and it makes about as much sense to snapshot kvm.git as it does to snapshot my vfio next branch or Michael's virtio queue. If we only pull from mainline we never have to worry about regressing something that isn't actually upstream yet. Thanks, Alex