From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43312)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <marcel.a@redhat.com>) id 1VLcZC-00024y-BZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <marcel.a@redhat.com>) id 1VLcZ5-0007FK-Tx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:30 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55485)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <marcel.a@redhat.com>) id 1VLcZ5-0007FF-LG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:23 -0400
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8GHQN78025882
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:26:23 -0400
Message-ID: <1379352391.17705.79.camel@localhost.localdomain>
From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 20:26:31 +0300
In-Reply-To: <52373D5A.2050004@redhat.com>
References: <1379342904.17705.69.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<52371B45.8000508@redhat.com>
	<1379351503.17705.77.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<52373D5A.2050004@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Question] memory: AddressSpace backed by single
 IO MemoryRegion
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 19:18 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 16/09/2013 19:11, Marcel Apfelbaum ha scritto:
> >> >     memory_region_init_io(my_reg, owner, my_ops, my_obj, "my region", INT64_MAX);
> 
> This is 2^63-1, not 2^64-1.  You need UINT64_MAX here.
Ooops! Thanks a lot and sorry for the trouble!
Marcel

> 
> Paolo
> 
> >> >     memory_region_set_enabled(my_reg, false);
> >> >     address_space_init(my_as, my_reg, name);
> >> >     memory_region_set_enabled(my_reg, true);
> 
>