From: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spapr_vscsi: Fix REPORT_LUNS handling
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 07:33:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1382099622-87967-1-git-send-email-nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> (raw)
Intercept REPORT_LUNS commands addressed either to SRP LUN 0 or the well-known
LUN for REPORT_LUNS commands. This is required to implement the SAM and SPC
specifications.
Since SRP implements only a single SCSI target port per connection, the SRP
target is required to report all available LUNs in response to a REPORT_LUNS
command addressed either to LUN 0 or the well-known LUN. Instead, QEMU was
forwarding such requests to the first QEMU SCSI target, with the result that
initiators that relied on this feature would only see LUNs on the first QEMU
SCSI target.
Behavior for REPORT_LUNS commands addressed to any other LUN is not specified
by the standard and so is left unchanged. This preserves behavior under Linux
and SLOF, which enumerate possible LUNs by hand and so address no commands
either to LUN 0 or the well-known REPORT_LUNS LUN.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>
---
hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
index 2a26042..87e0fb3 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@
#define SCSI_SENSE_BUF_SIZE 96
#define SRP_RSP_SENSE_DATA_LEN 18
+#define SRP_REPORT_LUNS_WLUN 0xc10100000000000
+
typedef union vscsi_crq {
struct viosrp_crq s;
uint8_t raw[16];
@@ -720,12 +722,67 @@ static void vscsi_inquiry_no_target(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
}
}
+static void vscsi_report_luns(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
+{
+ BusChild *kid;
+ int i, len, n, rc;
+ uint8_t *resp_data;
+ bool found_lun0;
+
+ n = 0;
+ found_lun0 = false;
+ QTAILQ_FOREACH(kid, &s->bus.qbus.children, sibling) {
+ SCSIDevice *dev = SCSI_DEVICE(kid->child);
+
+ n += 8;
+ if (dev->channel == 0 && dev->id == 0 && dev->lun == 0)
+ found_lun0 = true;
+ }
+ if (!found_lun0) {
+ n += 8;
+ }
+ len = n+8;
+
+ resp_data = malloc(len);
+ memset(resp_data, 0, len);
+ stl_be_p(resp_data, n);
+ i = found_lun0 ? 8 : 16;
+ QTAILQ_FOREACH(kid, &s->bus.qbus.children, sibling) {
+ DeviceState *qdev = kid->child;
+ SCSIDevice *dev = SCSI_DEVICE(qdev);
+
+ if (dev->id == 0 && dev->channel == 0)
+ resp_data[i] = 0;
+ else
+ resp_data[i] = (2 << 6);
+ resp_data[i] |= dev->id;
+ resp_data[i+1] = (dev->channel << 5);
+ resp_data[i+1] |= dev->lun;
+ i += 8;
+ }
+
+ vscsi_preprocess_desc(req);
+ rc = vscsi_srp_transfer_data(s, req, 0, resp_data, len);
+ free(resp_data);
+ if (rc < 0) {
+ vscsi_makeup_sense(s, req, HARDWARE_ERROR, 0, 0);
+ vscsi_send_rsp(s, req, CHECK_CONDITION, 0, 0);
+ } else {
+ vscsi_send_rsp(s, req, 0, len - rc, 0);
+ }
+}
+
static int vscsi_queue_cmd(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req)
{
union srp_iu *srp = &req->iu.srp;
SCSIDevice *sdev;
int n, lun;
+ if ((srp->cmd.lun == 0 || be64_to_cpu(srp->cmd.lun) == SRP_REPORT_LUNS_WLUN) && srp->cmd.cdb[0] == REPORT_LUNS) {
+ vscsi_report_luns(s, req);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
sdev = vscsi_device_find(&s->bus, be64_to_cpu(srp->cmd.lun), &lun);
if (!sdev) {
DPRINTF("VSCSI: Command for lun %08" PRIx64 " with no drive\n",
--
1.8.4
next reply other threads:[~2013-10-18 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-18 12:33 Nathan Whitehorn [this message]
2013-12-02 17:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] spapr_vscsi: Fix REPORT_LUNS handling Nathan Whitehorn
2013-12-02 17:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-02 15:05 ` Nathan Whitehorn
2014-01-02 15:31 ` Alexander Graf
2014-01-02 15:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " Alexander Graf
2014-01-02 15:56 ` ronnie sahlberg
2014-01-02 18:14 ` Nathan Whitehorn
2014-01-02 21:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-02 18:23 ` Nathan Whitehorn
2014-01-03 13:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-12 22:35 ` Nathan Whitehorn
2014-01-02 18:28 ` [Qemu-devel] " Nathan Whitehorn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1382099622-87967-1-git-send-email-nwhitehorn@freebsd.org \
--to=nwhitehorn@freebsd.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).