From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VeNgJ-0006EK-4m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 06:23:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VeNgD-0003xh-6j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 06:23:23 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5394) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VeNgC-0003xd-UO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 06:23:17 -0500 Message-ID: <1383823393.3511.2.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 12:23:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87txfpy1zm.fsf@elfo.elfo> References: <1383743088-8139-1-git-send-email-quintela@redhat.com> <1383748635.1739.92.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <87txfpy1zm.fsf@elfo.elfo> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/39] bitmap handling optimization List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: quintela@redhat.com Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, > > Yep, needed to figure updated screen areas. It never stops completely, > > but the refresh rate should be alot lower with no vnc client connected, > > something like once every few seconds without client vs. 30x per second > > with client. > > When the guest is stopped you really need to ask kvm for changes? > strange, no? Ahem, no. Could certainly be improved. cheers, Gerd