From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45417) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ViGJu-00064E-Lt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 23:20:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ViGJj-0001jE-R8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 23:20:18 -0500 Received: from e23smtp02.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.144]:60731) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ViGJj-0001hZ-2j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2013 23:20:07 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp02.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 14:19:40 +1000 From: Alexey Kardashevskiy Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 15:19:31 +1100 Message-Id: <1384748372-24131-2-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> In-Reply-To: <1384748372-24131-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> References: <1384748372-24131-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 1/2] spapr: make sure RMA is in first mode of first memory node List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Paul Mackerras , Alexander Graf The SPAPR specification says that the RMA starts at the LPAR's logical address 0 and is the first logical memory block reported in the LPAR’s device tree. So SLOF only maps the first block and that block needs to span the full RMA. This makes sure that the RMA area is where SLOF expects it. Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy --- Changes: v4: * fixed a bug with preallocated RMA (thanks to Thomas Huth) v3: * removed unnecessary RMA fixup from spapr_populate_memory() v2: * changed as recommended by Alex Graf --- hw/ppc/spapr.c | 14 +++++++++----- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c index 7e53a5f..036246c 100644 --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c @@ -532,9 +532,6 @@ static int spapr_populate_memory(sPAPREnvironment *spapr, void *fdt) /* memory node(s) */ node0_size = (nb_numa_nodes > 1) ? node_mem[0] : ram_size; - if (spapr->rma_size > node0_size) { - spapr->rma_size = node0_size; - } /* RMA */ mem_reg_property[0] = 0; @@ -1113,6 +1110,7 @@ static void ppc_spapr_init(QEMUMachineInitArgs *args) MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory(); MemoryRegion *ram = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1); hwaddr rma_alloc_size; + hwaddr node0_size = (nb_numa_nodes > 1) ? node_mem[0] : ram_size; uint32_t initrd_base = 0; long kernel_size = 0, initrd_size = 0; long load_limit, rtas_limit, fw_size; @@ -1134,10 +1132,10 @@ static void ppc_spapr_init(QEMUMachineInitArgs *args) exit(1); } - if (rma_alloc_size && (rma_alloc_size < ram_size)) { + if (rma_alloc_size && (rma_alloc_size < node0_size)) { spapr->rma_size = rma_alloc_size; } else { - spapr->rma_size = ram_size; + spapr->rma_size = node0_size; /* With KVM, we don't actually know whether KVM supports an * unbounded RMA (PR KVM) or is limited by the hash table size @@ -1154,6 +1152,12 @@ static void ppc_spapr_init(QEMUMachineInitArgs *args) } } + if (spapr->rma_size > node0_size) { + fprintf(stderr, "Error: Numa node 0 has to span the RMA (%#08"HWADDR_PRIx")\n", + spapr->rma_size); + exit(1); + } + /* We place the device tree and RTAS just below either the top of the RMA, * or just below 2GB, whichever is lowere, so that it can be * processed with 32-bit real mode code if necessary */ -- 1.8.4.rc4