From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, pl@kamp.de, ronniesahlberg@gmail.com,
stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/19] block: make bdrv_co_do_write_zeroes stricter in producing aligned requests
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 13:39:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1385124001-3576-7-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385124001-3576-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Right now, bdrv_co_do_write_zeroes will only try to align the
beginning of the request. However, it is simpler for many
formats to expect the block layer to separate both the head *and*
the tail. This makes sure that the format's bdrv_co_write_zeroes
function will be called with aligned sector_num and nb_sectors for
the bulk of the request.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
block.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index b18ee6b..de66b21 100644
--- a/block.c
+++ b/block.c
@@ -2768,14 +2768,21 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_write_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
while (nb_sectors > 0 && !ret) {
int num = nb_sectors;
- /* align request */
- if (bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment &&
- num >= bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment &&
- sector_num % bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment) {
- if (num > bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment) {
+ /* Align request. Block drivers can expect the "bulk" of the request
+ * to be aligned.
+ */
+ if (bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment
+ && num > bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment) {
+ if (sector_num % bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment != 0) {
+ /* Make a small request up to the first aligned sector. */
num = bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment;
+ num -= sector_num % bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment;
+ } else if ((sector_num + num) % bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment != 0) {
+ /* Shorten the request to the last aligned sector. num cannot
+ * underflow because num > bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment.
+ */
+ num -= (sector_num + num) % bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment;
}
- num -= sector_num % bs->bl.write_zeroes_alignment;
}
/* limit request size */
@@ -2793,16 +2800,20 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_write_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
/* Fall back to bounce buffer if write zeroes is unsupported */
iov.iov_len = num * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
if (iov.iov_base == NULL) {
- /* allocate bounce buffer only once and ensure that it
- * is big enough for this and all future requests.
- */
- size_t bufsize = num <= nb_sectors ? num : max_write_zeroes;
- iov.iov_base = qemu_blockalign(bs, bufsize * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
- memset(iov.iov_base, 0, bufsize * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
+ iov.iov_base = qemu_blockalign(bs, num * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
+ memset(iov.iov_base, 0, num * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
}
qemu_iovec_init_external(&qiov, &iov, 1);
ret = drv->bdrv_co_writev(bs, sector_num, num, &qiov);
+
+ /* Keep bounce buffer around if it is big enough for all
+ * all future requests.
+ */
+ if (num < max_write_zeroes) {
+ qemu_vfree(iov.iov_base);
+ iov.iov_base = NULL;
+ }
}
sector_num += num;
--
1.8.4.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-22 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-22 12:39 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/19] block & scsi: write_zeroes support through the whole stack Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-22 12:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/19] block: generalize BlockLimits handling to cover bdrv_aio_discard too Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-25 9:09 ` Peter Lieven
2013-11-22 12:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 02/19] block: add flags to BlockRequest Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-25 9:11 ` Peter Lieven
2013-11-22 12:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/19] block: add flags argument to bdrv_co_write_zeroes tracepoint Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-25 9:12 ` Peter Lieven
2013-11-22 12:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 04/19] block: add bdrv_aio_write_zeroes Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-25 9:13 ` Peter Lieven
2013-11-22 12:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 05/19] block: handle ENOTSUP from discard in generic code Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-25 10:06 ` Peter Lieven
2013-11-25 10:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-22 12:39 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-11-25 10:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/19] block: make bdrv_co_do_write_zeroes stricter in producing aligned requests Peter Lieven
2013-11-22 12:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 07/19] vpc, vhdx: add get_info Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-25 10:27 ` Peter Lieven
2013-11-22 12:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/19] block drivers: add discard/write_zeroes properties to bdrv_get_info implementation Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-25 10:29 ` Peter Lieven
2013-12-03 15:09 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-12-03 15:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-03 17:10 ` Peter Lieven
2013-11-22 12:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 09/19] block drivers: expose requirement for write same alignment from formats Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-25 10:33 ` Peter Lieven
2013-11-22 12:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/19] block/iscsi: remove .bdrv_has_zero_init Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-22 12:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 11/19] block/iscsi: updated copyright Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-22 12:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 12/19] block/iscsi: check WRITE SAME support differently depending on MAY_UNMAP Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-25 10:34 ` Peter Lieven
2013-11-25 10:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-22 12:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 13/19] raw-posix: implement write_zeroes with MAY_UNMAP for files Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-22 12:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 14/19] raw-posix: implement write_zeroes with MAY_UNMAP for block devices Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-22 12:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 15/19] raw-posix: add support for write_zeroes on XFS and " Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-22 12:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 16/19] qemu-iotests: 033 is fast Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-22 12:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 17/19] scsi-disk: catch write protection errors in UNMAP Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-22 12:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 18/19] scsi-disk: reject ANCHOR=1 for UNMAP and WRITE SAME commands Paolo Bonzini
2013-11-22 12:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 19/19] scsi-disk: correctly implement WRITE SAME Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-03 14:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/19] block & scsi: write_zeroes support through the whole stack Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1385124001-3576-7-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).