From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39295) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VlqD4-0004Af-Bb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:16:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VlqCz-0002EW-Jx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:16:02 -0500 Received: from [222.73.24.84] (port=33014 helo=song.cn.fujitsu.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VlqCy-0002Cf-U5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:15:57 -0500 Message-ID: <1385601243.23188.7.camel@G08FNSTD131468> From: Chen Fan Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:14:03 +0800 In-Reply-To: <5295FAE3.5060900@redhat.com> References: <5295FAE3.5060900@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC qom-cpu v4 05/10] qmp: add 'cpu-del' command support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: Igor Mammedov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 07:00 -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 10/09/2013 03:43 AM, Chen Fan wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Chen Fan > > --- > > hw/i386/pc.c | 6 ++++++ > > hw/i386/pc_piix.c | 3 ++- > > include/hw/boards.h | 2 ++ > > include/hw/i386/pc.h | 1 + > > qapi-schema.json | 12 ++++++++++++ > > qmp-commands.hx | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > > qmp.c | 9 +++++++++ > > 7 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > +++ b/qapi-schema.json > > @@ -1479,6 +1479,18 @@ > > ## > > { 'command': 'cpu-add', 'data': {'id': 'int'} } > > > > +# @cpu-del > > + > > +# Deletes CPU with specified ID > > +# > > +# @id: ID of CPU to be deleted, valid values [0..max_cpus) > > +# > > +# Returns: Nothing on success > > +# > > +# Since 1.7 > > Since this mail is still titled RFC, there's no way it will make it into > 1.7. Are you shooting for 1.8? > Hi, this patchseries had not been commented yet, maybe I should send it again after Rebase without RFC for 1.8. Thanks, Chen