From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VmKjD-0002Vi-0H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 04:51:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VmKj7-00034t-0Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 04:51:14 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:61296) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VmKj6-00034p-Oa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 04:51:08 -0500 Message-ID: <1385718663.23450.14.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:51:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1384777531-14635-1-git-send-email-marcandre.lureau@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/21] RFCv2: add Spice block device List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Marc-Andr=E9?= Lureau Cc: Kevin Wolf , jcody , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fr, 2013-11-22 at 14:28 +0100, Marc-Andr=C3=A9 Lureau wrote: > Hi there, >=20 > Even though there is no rush to review this series, it would be nice > to get the first ~10 patches. It would make the next rebase easier, > and the review smaller. Can you send the ready-to-go spice bits as separate patch series (after addressing alon's comment on patch #5)? Then I'll add them to the spice queue. thanks, Gerd