From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39892) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqPdI-0003XU-5w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:54:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqPdC-0006Jm-6w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:54:00 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56353) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqPdB-0006Jd-VX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:53:54 -0500 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBAFrrtY022274 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:53:53 -0500 Message-ID: <1386690784.15686.30.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> From: Gerd Hoffmann In-Reply-To: <52A7377C.7050400@redhat.com> References: <1385401393-14291-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20131128102652.GA24261@redhat.com> <52A714AC.3050703@redhat.com> <1386687211.15686.21.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <52A7377C.7050400@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:53:04 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH rebased for-1.8] i386: pc: align gpa<->hpa on 1GB boundary (v6) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laszlo Ersek Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Marcelo Tosatti , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" On Di, 2013-12-10 at 16:47 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 12/10/13 15:53, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > >> If we could make a small guset visible change, it would be simpler to > >> always make the PCI hole 1GB in size; it is currently 256MB for i440FX > >> and 1.25GB for q35. > > > > Easy for i440fx. > > I think it's going to break OVMF again. Can't see a reason why it should. > Also, I don't understand the reference to "it is currently 256MB for > i440FX"... My understanding was that the PCI hole didn't shrink below > 512MB in size for i440fx -- sorry if I missed something. 512MB is correct (0xe0000000+). cheers, Gerd