From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqeig-0000y0-I4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 03:00:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqeia-0007RT-IP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 03:00:34 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vqeia-0007RP-AF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 03:00:28 -0500 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBB80P5f015772 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 03:00:26 -0500 Message-ID: <1386748806.26258.2.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:00:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20131210231750.GA27967@redhat.com> References: <1385401393-14291-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20131128102652.GA24261@redhat.com> <52A714AC.3050703@redhat.com> <1386687211.15686.21.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <52A7377C.7050400@redhat.com> <1386690784.15686.30.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <52A75364.5060505@redhat.com> <20131210210009.GA8476@redhat.com> <52A79202.9060302@redhat.com> <52A7928C.80005@redhat.com> <20131210231750.GA27967@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH rebased for-1.8] i386: pc: align gpa<->hpa on 1GB boundary (v6) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Marcelo Tosatti , Laszlo Ersek , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, > I'd like to merge Gerd's patch, and a similar patch for q35. > For q35 we need to get rid of MCH_HOST_BRIDGE_PCIEXBAR_DEFAULT. Missing q35 patch is no reason to delay the i440fx fix though. > However, I think we have to limit this change to pc-2.0 and newer: > qemu 1.8 still has the "pci hole" concept, so guest can't put > devices outside the specific ranges. --verbose please. I fail to see the problem here. cheers, Gerd