From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, pl@kamp.de, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 20/22] block: Change coroutine wrapper to byte granularity
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 22:08:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1386796109-15264-21-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386796109-15264-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
---
block.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index 98ea723..5e2e092 100644
--- a/block.c
+++ b/block.c
@@ -69,11 +69,11 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_readv_em(BlockDriverState *bs,
static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_writev_em(BlockDriverState *bs,
int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors,
QEMUIOVector *iov);
-static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_readv(BlockDriverState *bs,
- int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors, QEMUIOVector *qiov,
+static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_preadv(BlockDriverState *bs,
+ int64_t offset, unsigned int bytes, QEMUIOVector *qiov,
BdrvRequestFlags flags);
-static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_writev(BlockDriverState *bs,
- int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors, QEMUIOVector *qiov,
+static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_pwritev(BlockDriverState *bs,
+ int64_t offset, unsigned int bytes, QEMUIOVector *qiov,
BdrvRequestFlags flags);
static BlockDriverAIOCB *bdrv_co_aio_rw_vector(BlockDriverState *bs,
int64_t sector_num,
@@ -2361,8 +2361,7 @@ static int bdrv_check_request(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
typedef struct RwCo {
BlockDriverState *bs;
- int64_t sector_num;
- int nb_sectors;
+ int64_t offset;
QEMUIOVector *qiov;
bool is_write;
int ret;
@@ -2374,34 +2373,32 @@ static void coroutine_fn bdrv_rw_co_entry(void *opaque)
RwCo *rwco = opaque;
if (!rwco->is_write) {
- rwco->ret = bdrv_co_do_readv(rwco->bs, rwco->sector_num,
- rwco->nb_sectors, rwco->qiov,
- rwco->flags);
- } else {
- rwco->ret = bdrv_co_do_writev(rwco->bs, rwco->sector_num,
- rwco->nb_sectors, rwco->qiov,
+ rwco->ret = bdrv_co_do_preadv(rwco->bs, rwco->offset,
+ rwco->qiov->size, rwco->qiov,
rwco->flags);
+ } else {
+ rwco->ret = bdrv_co_do_pwritev(rwco->bs, rwco->offset,
+ rwco->qiov->size, rwco->qiov,
+ rwco->flags);
}
}
/*
* Process a vectored synchronous request using coroutines
*/
-static int bdrv_rwv_co(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
- QEMUIOVector *qiov, bool is_write,
- BdrvRequestFlags flags)
+static int bdrv_prwv_co(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset,
+ QEMUIOVector *qiov, bool is_write,
+ BdrvRequestFlags flags)
{
Coroutine *co;
RwCo rwco = {
.bs = bs,
- .sector_num = sector_num,
- .nb_sectors = qiov->size >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
+ .offset = offset,
.qiov = qiov,
.is_write = is_write,
.ret = NOT_DONE,
.flags = flags,
};
- assert((qiov->size & (BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE - 1)) == 0);
/**
* In sync call context, when the vcpu is blocked, this throttling timer
@@ -2440,7 +2437,8 @@ static int bdrv_rw_co(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num, uint8_t *buf,
};
qemu_iovec_init_external(&qiov, &iov, 1);
- return bdrv_rwv_co(bs, sector_num, &qiov, is_write, flags);
+ return bdrv_prwv_co(bs, sector_num << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS,
+ &qiov, is_write, flags);
}
/* return < 0 if error. See bdrv_write() for the return codes */
@@ -2478,7 +2476,7 @@ int bdrv_write(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
int bdrv_writev(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num, QEMUIOVector *qiov)
{
- return bdrv_rwv_co(bs, sector_num, qiov, true, 0);
+ return bdrv_prwv_co(bs, sector_num << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS, qiov, true, 0);
}
int bdrv_write_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
@@ -4586,9 +4584,15 @@ int bdrv_flush(BlockDriverState *bs)
return rwco.ret;
}
+typedef struct DiscardCo {
+ BlockDriverState *bs;
+ int64_t sector_num;
+ int nb_sectors;
+ int ret;
+} DiscardCo;
static void coroutine_fn bdrv_discard_co_entry(void *opaque)
{
- RwCo *rwco = opaque;
+ DiscardCo *rwco = opaque;
rwco->ret = bdrv_co_discard(rwco->bs, rwco->sector_num, rwco->nb_sectors);
}
@@ -4672,7 +4676,7 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_discard(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
int bdrv_discard(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors)
{
Coroutine *co;
- RwCo rwco = {
+ DiscardCo rwco = {
.bs = bs,
.sector_num = sector_num,
.nb_sectors = nb_sectors,
--
1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-11 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-11 21:08 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/22] block: Support for 512b-on-4k emulation Kevin Wolf
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/22] block: Move initialisation of BlockLimits to bdrv_refresh_limits() Kevin Wolf
2013-12-12 2:54 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-12-12 2:57 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-12-12 7:51 ` Thomas Huth
2013-12-12 9:32 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-12-12 6:17 ` Peter Lieven
2013-12-12 9:35 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/22] block: Inherit opt_transfer_length Kevin Wolf
2013-12-12 3:02 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/22] block: Update BlockLimits when they might have changed Kevin Wolf
2013-12-12 3:09 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/22] qemu_memalign: Allow small alignments Kevin Wolf
2013-12-12 3:09 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/22] block: Detect unaligned length in bdrv_qiov_is_aligned() Kevin Wolf
2013-12-12 3:15 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/22] block: Don't use guest sector size for qemu_blockalign() Kevin Wolf
2013-12-12 6:32 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/22] block: rename buffer_alignment to guest_block_size Kevin Wolf
2013-12-12 6:34 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/22] raw: Probe required direct I/O alignment Kevin Wolf
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/22] block: Introduce bdrv_aligned_preadv() Kevin Wolf
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/22] block: Introduce bdrv_co_do_preadv() Kevin Wolf
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 11/22] block: Introduce bdrv_aligned_pwritev() Kevin Wolf
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 12/22] block: write: Handle COR dependency after I/O throttling Kevin Wolf
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 13/22] block: Introduce bdrv_co_do_pwritev() Kevin Wolf
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 14/22] block: Switch BdrvTrackedRequest to byte granularity Kevin Wolf
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/22] block: Allow waiting for overlapping requests between begin/end Kevin Wolf
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 16/22] block: Make zero-after-EOF work with larger alignment Kevin Wolf
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 17/22] block: Generalise and optimise COR serialisation Kevin Wolf
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 18/22] block: Make overlap range for serialisation dynamic Kevin Wolf
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 19/22] block: Align requests in bdrv_co_do_pwritev() Kevin Wolf
2013-12-11 21:08 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 21/22] block: Make bdrv_pread() a bdrv_prwv_co() wrapper Kevin Wolf
2013-12-11 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 22/22] block: Make bdrv_pwrite() " Kevin Wolf
2013-12-12 6:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/22] block: Support for 512b-on-4k emulation Peter Lieven
2013-12-12 9:47 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-12-12 10:26 ` Peter Lieven
2013-12-12 12:48 ` Peter Lieven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1386796109-15264-21-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).