From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56534) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VswXk-00029L-S6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:26:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VswXe-0000pA-S3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:26:44 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46356) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VswXe-0000oq-Ka for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:26:38 -0500 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBHFQbE9021886 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:26:38 -0500 From: Juan Quintela Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 16:25:54 +0100 Message-Id: <1387293974-24718-19-git-send-email-quintela@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1387293974-24718-1-git-send-email-quintela@redhat.com> References: <1387293974-24718-1-git-send-email-quintela@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 18/38] memory: unfold cpu_physical_memory_clear_dirty_flag() in its only user List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela Reviewed-by: Eric Blake --- include/exec/memory-internal.h | 10 ++-------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/exec/memory-internal.h b/include/exec/memory-internal.h index 6fb1b64..2f6610a 100644 --- a/include/exec/memory-internal.h +++ b/include/exec/memory-internal.h @@ -86,13 +86,6 @@ static inline void cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty(ram_addr_t addr) cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_flag(addr, DIRTY_MEMORY_CODE); } -static inline void cpu_physical_memory_clear_dirty_flag(ram_addr_t addr, - unsigned client) -{ - assert(client < DIRTY_MEMORY_NUM); - clear_bit(addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS, ram_list.dirty_memory[client]); -} - static inline void cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range(ram_addr_t start, ram_addr_t length) { @@ -112,10 +105,11 @@ static inline void cpu_physical_memory_mask_dirty_range(ram_addr_t start, { ram_addr_t addr, end; + assert(client < DIRTY_MEMORY_NUM); end = TARGET_PAGE_ALIGN(start + length); start &= TARGET_PAGE_MASK; for (addr = start; addr < end; addr += TARGET_PAGE_SIZE) { - cpu_physical_memory_clear_dirty_flag(addr, client); + clear_bit(addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS, ram_list.dirty_memory[client]); } } -- 1.8.3.1