From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VzAet-0000Bu-La for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:43:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VzAeo-0007lj-K6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:43:51 -0500 Message-ID: <1388778201.11795.67.camel@snotra.buserror.net> From: Scott Wood Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 13:43:21 -0600 In-Reply-To: <52C70E6C.9020609@gmail.com> References: <1387399747-4994-1-git-send-email-tommusta@gmail.com> <1387399747-4994-4-git-send-email-tommusta@gmail.com> <1388190626.21454.36.camel@snotra.buserror.net> <52C70E6C.9020609@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [V3 PATCH 03/14] target-ppc: Add ISA2.06 divdeu[o] Instructions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Tom Musta Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 13:24 -0600, Tom Musta wrote: > On 12/27/2013 6:30 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > > These instructions are phased-in on embedded, and unlike bpermd are not > > present on e5500/e6500 which are 64-bit ISA 2.06 implementations. > > Wasn't the conclusion in a previous thread to use separate flags for > > these instruction groups? > > > > -Scott > > Scott: > > Yes ... but those comments were made *after* this revision was published > (http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-12/msg03681.html). > > I have yet to produce V4 of this series which will include the new and > separate flags. Oops... for some reason I thought the patchset was newer. Sorry about that. -Scott