From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32999) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5YDW-0008S5-PI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 05:06:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5YDJ-0007py-UU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 05:05:58 -0500 Received: from e23smtp05.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.147]:34783) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5YDJ-0007pQ-5S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 05:05:45 -0500 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp05.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 20:05:40 +1000 From: Alexey Kardashevskiy Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 21:05:33 +1100 Message-Id: <1390298735-6403-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] spapr: fix H_SET_MODE List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf This is v2 of "spapr: reset @kvm_vcpu_dirty before starting CPU" Does it make much sense to split "spapr-hcall: fix H_SET_MODE"? Please comment. Thanks! Alexey Kardashevskiy (2): target-ppc: introduce powerisa-207-server flag spapr-hcall: fix H_SET_MODE hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 9 +++++-- target-ppc/cpu.h | 4 +++ target-ppc/translate_init.c | 3 ++- 4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) -- 1.8.4.rc4