qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Qemu-devel] Possible bug in monitor code
@ 2014-01-22 15:53 Stratos Psomadakis
  2014-01-23  3:07 ` Fam Zheng
  2014-01-24 23:48 ` Luiz Capitulino
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stratos Psomadakis @ 2014-01-22 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel
  Cc: Synnefo Development, Stratos Psomadakis, Ganeti Development,
	Dimitris Aragiorgis


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3055 bytes --]

Hi,

we've encountered a weird issue regarding monitor (qmp and hmp) behavior
with qemu-1.7 (and qemu-1.5). The following steps will reproduce the issue:

    1) Client A connects to qmp socket with socat
    2) Client A gets greeting message {"QMP": {"version": ..}
    3) Client A waits (select on the socket's fd)
    4) Client B tries to connect to the *same* qmp socket with socat
    5) Client B does *NOT* get any greating message
    6) Client B waits (select on the socket's fd)
    7) Client B closes connection (kill socat)
    8) Client A quits too
    9) Client C connects to qmp socket
    10) Client C gets *two* greeting messages!!!

After some investigation, we traced it down to the monitor_flush()
function in monitor.c. Specifically, when a second client connects to
the qmp (client B), while another one is already using it (client A), we
get the following from stracing the second client (client B):

    connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="foo.mon"}, 9) = 0
    getsockname(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, NULL}, [2]) = 0
    select(4, [0 3], [1 3], [], NULL)       = 2 (out [1 3])
    select(4, [0 3], [], [], NULL

So, the connect() syscall from client B succeeds, although client B
connection has not yet been accepted by the qmp server (it's still in
the backlog of the qmp listening socket).

After killing client B and then client A, we see the following when
stracing the qemu proc:

    22363 accept4(6, {sa_family=AF_FILE, NULL}, [2], SOCK_CLOEXEC) = 9
    22363 fcntl(9, F_GETFL)                 = 0x2 (flags O_RDWR)
    22363 fcntl(9, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = 0
    22363 fstat(9, {st_mode=S_IFSOCK|0777, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
    22363 fcntl(9, F_GETFL)                 = 0x802 (flags
    O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK)
    22363 write(9, "{\"QMP\": {\"version\": {\"qemu\": {\"m"..., 127) =
    -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe)
    22363 --- SIGPIPE (Broken pipe) @ 0 (0) ---

The qmp server / qemu accepts the connection from client B (who has now
closed the connection) and tries to write the greeting message to the
socket fd. This results in write returning an error (EPIPE).

The monitor_flush() function doesn't seem to handle this case (write
error). Instead, it adds a watch / handler to retry the write operation.
Thus, mon->outbuf is not cleaned up properly, which results in duplicate
greeting messages for the next client to connect.

The following seems to do the trick.

diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
index 845f608..5622f20 100644
--- a/monitor.c
+++ b/monitor.c
@@ -288,8 +288,8 @@ void monitor_flush(Monitor *mon)
 
     if (len && !mon->mux_out) {
         rc = qemu_chr_fe_write(mon->chr, (const uint8_t *) buf, len);
-        if (rc == len) {
-            /* all flushed */
+        if ((rc < 0 && errno != EAGAIN) || (rc == len)) {
+            /* all flushed or error */
             QDECREF(mon->outbuf);
             mon->outbuf = qstring_new();
             return;

Comments?

Thanks,
Stratos

-- 
Stratos Psomadakis
<psomas@grnet.gr>


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4264 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] Possible bug in monitor code
  2014-01-22 15:53 [Qemu-devel] Possible bug in monitor code Stratos Psomadakis
@ 2014-01-23  3:07 ` Fam Zheng
  2014-01-23 10:17   ` Stratos Psomadakis
  2014-01-24 23:48 ` Luiz Capitulino
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Fam Zheng @ 2014-01-23  3:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stratos Psomadakis
  Cc: Synnefo Development, Ganeti Development, qemu-devel,
	Dimitris Aragiorgis

On Wed, 01/22 17:53, Stratos Psomadakis wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> we've encountered a weird issue regarding monitor (qmp and hmp) behavior
> with qemu-1.7 (and qemu-1.5). The following steps will reproduce the issue:
> 
>     1) Client A connects to qmp socket with socat
>     2) Client A gets greeting message {"QMP": {"version": ..}
>     3) Client A waits (select on the socket's fd)
>     4) Client B tries to connect to the *same* qmp socket with socat
>     5) Client B does *NOT* get any greating message
>     6) Client B waits (select on the socket's fd)
>     7) Client B closes connection (kill socat)
>     8) Client A quits too
>     9) Client C connects to qmp socket
>     10) Client C gets *two* greeting messages!!!

Hi Stratos, thank you for debugging and reporting this.

I tested this sequence but can't fully reproduce this. What I see is 5) but no
10). Client C acts normally. And your patch below doesn't solve it for me.

To submit a patch, please follow instructions as described in
http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch
so it could be picked up by maintainers. Specifically, you need to format your
patch email with "git format-patch" and add a "Signed-off-by:" line in your
patch email.

Thanks,

Fam

> 
> After some investigation, we traced it down to the monitor_flush()
> function in monitor.c. Specifically, when a second client connects to
> the qmp (client B), while another one is already using it (client A), we
> get the following from stracing the second client (client B):
> 
>     connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="foo.mon"}, 9) = 0
>     getsockname(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, NULL}, [2]) = 0
>     select(4, [0 3], [1 3], [], NULL)       = 2 (out [1 3])
>     select(4, [0 3], [], [], NULL
> 
> So, the connect() syscall from client B succeeds, although client B
> connection has not yet been accepted by the qmp server (it's still in
> the backlog of the qmp listening socket).
> 
> After killing client B and then client A, we see the following when
> stracing the qemu proc:
> 
>     22363 accept4(6, {sa_family=AF_FILE, NULL}, [2], SOCK_CLOEXEC) = 9
>     22363 fcntl(9, F_GETFL)                 = 0x2 (flags O_RDWR)
>     22363 fcntl(9, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = 0
>     22363 fstat(9, {st_mode=S_IFSOCK|0777, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
>     22363 fcntl(9, F_GETFL)                 = 0x802 (flags
>     O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK)
>     22363 write(9, "{\"QMP\": {\"version\": {\"qemu\": {\"m"..., 127) =
>     -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe)
>     22363 --- SIGPIPE (Broken pipe) @ 0 (0) ---
> 
> The qmp server / qemu accepts the connection from client B (who has now
> closed the connection) and tries to write the greeting message to the
> socket fd. This results in write returning an error (EPIPE).
> 
> The monitor_flush() function doesn't seem to handle this case (write
> error). Instead, it adds a watch / handler to retry the write operation.
> Thus, mon->outbuf is not cleaned up properly, which results in duplicate
> greeting messages for the next client to connect.
> 
> The following seems to do the trick.
> 
> diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
> index 845f608..5622f20 100644
> --- a/monitor.c
> +++ b/monitor.c
> @@ -288,8 +288,8 @@ void monitor_flush(Monitor *mon)
>  
>      if (len && !mon->mux_out) {
>          rc = qemu_chr_fe_write(mon->chr, (const uint8_t *) buf, len);
> -        if (rc == len) {
> -            /* all flushed */
> +        if ((rc < 0 && errno != EAGAIN) || (rc == len)) {
> +            /* all flushed or error */
>              QDECREF(mon->outbuf);
>              mon->outbuf = qstring_new();
>              return;
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Thanks,
> Stratos
> 
> -- 
> Stratos Psomadakis
> <psomas@grnet.gr>
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] Possible bug in monitor code
  2014-01-23  3:07 ` Fam Zheng
@ 2014-01-23 10:17   ` Stratos Psomadakis
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stratos Psomadakis @ 2014-01-23 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fam Zheng
  Cc: Synnefo Development, Ganeti Development, qemu-devel,
	Dimitris Aragiorgis

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4288 bytes --]

On 01/23/2014 05:07 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Wed, 01/22 17:53, Stratos Psomadakis wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we've encountered a weird issue regarding monitor (qmp and hmp) behavior
>> with qemu-1.7 (and qemu-1.5). The following steps will reproduce the issue:
>>
>>     1) Client A connects to qmp socket with socat
>>     2) Client A gets greeting message {"QMP": {"version": ..}
>>     3) Client A waits (select on the socket's fd)
>>     4) Client B tries to connect to the *same* qmp socket with socat
>>     5) Client B does *NOT* get any greating message
>>     6) Client B waits (select on the socket's fd)
>>     7) Client B closes connection (kill socat)
>>     8) Client A quits too
>>     9) Client C connects to qmp socket
>>     10) Client C gets *two* greeting messages!!!
> Hi Stratos, thank you for debugging and reporting this.
>
> I tested this sequence but can't fully reproduce this. What I see is 5) but no
> 10). Client C acts normally. And your patch below doesn't solve it for me.

Hm, which qemu version (or repo branch / tag) did you use? We did a
quick scan of the master branch code / commits, but we didn't find
anything that might fix the issue.

> To submit a patch, please follow instructions as described in
> http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch
> so it could be picked up by maintainers. Specifically, you need to format your
> patch email with "git format-patch" and add a "Signed-off-by:" line in your
> patch email.

Ok. If any dev can confirm that this is a bug (and that the patch below
is the correct way to fix it) I'll resubmit it properly.

Thanks,
Stratos

> Thanks,
>
> Fam
>
>> After some investigation, we traced it down to the monitor_flush()
>> function in monitor.c. Specifically, when a second client connects to
>> the qmp (client B), while another one is already using it (client A), we
>> get the following from stracing the second client (client B):
>>
>>     connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="foo.mon"}, 9) = 0
>>     getsockname(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, NULL}, [2]) = 0
>>     select(4, [0 3], [1 3], [], NULL)       = 2 (out [1 3])
>>     select(4, [0 3], [], [], NULL
>>
>> So, the connect() syscall from client B succeeds, although client B
>> connection has not yet been accepted by the qmp server (it's still in
>> the backlog of the qmp listening socket).
>>
>> After killing client B and then client A, we see the following when
>> stracing the qemu proc:
>>
>>     22363 accept4(6, {sa_family=AF_FILE, NULL}, [2], SOCK_CLOEXEC) = 9
>>     22363 fcntl(9, F_GETFL)                 = 0x2 (flags O_RDWR)
>>     22363 fcntl(9, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = 0
>>     22363 fstat(9, {st_mode=S_IFSOCK|0777, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
>>     22363 fcntl(9, F_GETFL)                 = 0x802 (flags
>>     O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK)
>>     22363 write(9, "{\"QMP\": {\"version\": {\"qemu\": {\"m"..., 127) =
>>     -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe)
>>     22363 --- SIGPIPE (Broken pipe) @ 0 (0) ---
>>
>> The qmp server / qemu accepts the connection from client B (who has now
>> closed the connection) and tries to write the greeting message to the
>> socket fd. This results in write returning an error (EPIPE).
>>
>> The monitor_flush() function doesn't seem to handle this case (write
>> error). Instead, it adds a watch / handler to retry the write operation.
>> Thus, mon->outbuf is not cleaned up properly, which results in duplicate
>> greeting messages for the next client to connect.
>>
>> The following seems to do the trick.
>>
>> diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
>> index 845f608..5622f20 100644
>> --- a/monitor.c
>> +++ b/monitor.c
>> @@ -288,8 +288,8 @@ void monitor_flush(Monitor *mon)
>>  
>>      if (len && !mon->mux_out) {
>>          rc = qemu_chr_fe_write(mon->chr, (const uint8_t *) buf, len);
>> -        if (rc == len) {
>> -            /* all flushed */
>> +        if ((rc < 0 && errno != EAGAIN) || (rc == len)) {
>> +            /* all flushed or error */
>>              QDECREF(mon->outbuf);
>>              mon->outbuf = qstring_new();
>>              return;
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stratos
>>
>> -- 
>> Stratos Psomadakis
>> <psomas@grnet.gr>
>>
>


-- 
Stratos Psomadakis
<psomas@grnet.gr>



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] Possible bug in monitor code
  2014-01-22 15:53 [Qemu-devel] Possible bug in monitor code Stratos Psomadakis
  2014-01-23  3:07 ` Fam Zheng
@ 2014-01-24 23:48 ` Luiz Capitulino
  2014-01-27 10:30   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Cleanup mon->outbuf on write error Stratos Psomadakis
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Luiz Capitulino @ 2014-01-24 23:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stratos Psomadakis
  Cc: Ganeti Development, qemu-devel, Synnefo Development, kraxel,
	Dimitris Aragiorgis

On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:53:52 +0200
Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@grnet.gr> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> we've encountered a weird issue regarding monitor (qmp and hmp) behavior
> with qemu-1.7 (and qemu-1.5). The following steps will reproduce the issue:
> 
>     1) Client A connects to qmp socket with socat
>     2) Client A gets greeting message {"QMP": {"version": ..}
>     3) Client A waits (select on the socket's fd)
>     4) Client B tries to connect to the *same* qmp socket with socat
>     5) Client B does *NOT* get any greating message
>     6) Client B waits (select on the socket's fd)
>     7) Client B closes connection (kill socat)
>     8) Client A quits too
>     9) Client C connects to qmp socket
>     10) Client C gets *two* greeting messages!!!
> 
> After some investigation, we traced it down to the monitor_flush()
> function in monitor.c. Specifically, when a second client connects to
> the qmp (client B), while another one is already using it (client A), we
> get the following from stracing the second client (client B):
> 
>     connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="foo.mon"}, 9) = 0
>     getsockname(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, NULL}, [2]) = 0
>     select(4, [0 3], [1 3], [], NULL)       = 2 (out [1 3])
>     select(4, [0 3], [], [], NULL
> 
> So, the connect() syscall from client B succeeds, although client B
> connection has not yet been accepted by the qmp server (it's still in
> the backlog of the qmp listening socket).
> 
> After killing client B and then client A, we see the following when
> stracing the qemu proc:
> 
>     22363 accept4(6, {sa_family=AF_FILE, NULL}, [2], SOCK_CLOEXEC) = 9
>     22363 fcntl(9, F_GETFL)                 = 0x2 (flags O_RDWR)
>     22363 fcntl(9, F_SETFL, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = 0
>     22363 fstat(9, {st_mode=S_IFSOCK|0777, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
>     22363 fcntl(9, F_GETFL)                 = 0x802 (flags
>     O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK)
>     22363 write(9, "{\"QMP\": {\"version\": {\"qemu\": {\"m"..., 127) =
>     -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe)
>     22363 --- SIGPIPE (Broken pipe) @ 0 (0) ---
> 
> The qmp server / qemu accepts the connection from client B (who has now
> closed the connection) and tries to write the greeting message to the
> socket fd. This results in write returning an error (EPIPE).
> 
> The monitor_flush() function doesn't seem to handle this case (write
> error). Instead, it adds a watch / handler to retry the write operation.
> Thus, mon->outbuf is not cleaned up properly, which results in duplicate
> greeting messages for the next client to connect.
> 
> The following seems to do the trick.
> 
> diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
> index 845f608..5622f20 100644
> --- a/monitor.c
> +++ b/monitor.c
> @@ -288,8 +288,8 @@ void monitor_flush(Monitor *mon)
>  
>      if (len && !mon->mux_out) {
>          rc = qemu_chr_fe_write(mon->chr, (const uint8_t *) buf, len);
> -        if (rc == len) {
> -            /* all flushed */
> +        if ((rc < 0 && errno != EAGAIN) || (rc == len)) {
> +            /* all flushed or error */
>              QDECREF(mon->outbuf);
>              mon->outbuf = qstring_new();
>              return;
> 
> Comments?

I can reproduce the problem very easily and I can't think of a better
way to fix it.

The right thing to do, I guess, would be to move the error up and kill
the connection if there's any. But last time I checked the chardev
layer did not have an API to kill a connection...

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Cleanup mon->outbuf on write error
  2014-01-24 23:48 ` Luiz Capitulino
@ 2014-01-27 10:30   ` Stratos Psomadakis
  2014-01-29 10:46     ` Stratos Psomadakis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stratos Psomadakis @ 2014-01-27 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: synnefo-devel, Stratos Psomdakis, ganeti-devel, dimara

In case monitor_flush() fails to write the contents of mon->outbuf to
the output device, mon->outbuf is not cleaned up properly. Check the
return code of the qemu_chr_fe_write() function and cleanup the outbuf
if it fails.

References: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-01/msg02890.html

Signed-off-by: Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@grnet.gr>
Signed-off-by: Dimitris Aragiorgis <dimara@grnet.gr>
---
 monitor.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
index 80456fb..cba56bc 100644
--- a/monitor.c
+++ b/monitor.c
@@ -288,8 +288,8 @@ void monitor_flush(Monitor *mon)
 
     if (len && !mon->mux_out) {
         rc = qemu_chr_fe_write(mon->chr, (const uint8_t *) buf, len);
-        if (rc == len) {
-            /* all flushed */
+        if ((rc < 0 && errno != EAGAIN) || (rc == len)) {
+            /* all flushed or error */
             QDECREF(mon->outbuf);
             mon->outbuf = qstring_new();
             return;
-- 
1.7.10.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Cleanup mon->outbuf on write error
  2014-01-27 10:30   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Cleanup mon->outbuf on write error Stratos Psomadakis
@ 2014-01-29 10:46     ` Stratos Psomadakis
  2014-01-29 14:12       ` Luiz Capitulino
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stratos Psomadakis @ 2014-01-29 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel
  Cc: synnefo-devel, Stratos Psomdakis, ganeti-devel, dimara,
	Luiz Capitulino

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1214 bytes --]

On 01/27/2014 12:30 PM, Stratos Psomadakis wrote:
> In case monitor_flush() fails to write the contents of mon->outbuf to
> the output device, mon->outbuf is not cleaned up properly. Check the
> return code of the qemu_chr_fe_write() function and cleanup the outbuf
> if it fails.
>
> References: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-01/msg02890.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@grnet.gr>
> Signed-off-by: Dimitris Aragiorgis <dimara@grnet.gr>
> ---
>  monitor.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
> index 80456fb..cba56bc 100644
> --- a/monitor.c
> +++ b/monitor.c
> @@ -288,8 +288,8 @@ void monitor_flush(Monitor *mon)
>  
>      if (len && !mon->mux_out) {
>          rc = qemu_chr_fe_write(mon->chr, (const uint8_t *) buf, len);
> -        if (rc == len) {
> -            /* all flushed */
> +        if ((rc < 0 && errno != EAGAIN) || (rc == len)) {
> +            /* all flushed or error */
>              QDECREF(mon->outbuf);
>              mon->outbuf = qstring_new();
>              return;
 
Forgot to cc the maintainer.

-- 
Stratos Psomadakis
<psomas@grnet.gr>



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 901 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Cleanup mon->outbuf on write error
  2014-01-29 10:46     ` Stratos Psomadakis
@ 2014-01-29 14:12       ` Luiz Capitulino
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Luiz Capitulino @ 2014-01-29 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stratos Psomadakis; +Cc: synnefo-devel, ganeti-devel, qemu-devel, dimara

On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 12:46:04 +0200
Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@grnet.gr> wrote:

> On 01/27/2014 12:30 PM, Stratos Psomadakis wrote:
> > In case monitor_flush() fails to write the contents of mon->outbuf to
> > the output device, mon->outbuf is not cleaned up properly. Check the
> > return code of the qemu_chr_fe_write() function and cleanup the outbuf
> > if it fails.
> >
> > References: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-01/msg02890.html
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@grnet.gr>
> > Signed-off-by: Dimitris Aragiorgis <dimara@grnet.gr>
> > ---
> >  monitor.c |    4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
> > index 80456fb..cba56bc 100644
> > --- a/monitor.c
> > +++ b/monitor.c
> > @@ -288,8 +288,8 @@ void monitor_flush(Monitor *mon)
> >  
> >      if (len && !mon->mux_out) {
> >          rc = qemu_chr_fe_write(mon->chr, (const uint8_t *) buf, len);
> > -        if (rc == len) {
> > -            /* all flushed */
> > +        if ((rc < 0 && errno != EAGAIN) || (rc == len)) {
> > +            /* all flushed or error */
> >              QDECREF(mon->outbuf);
> >              mon->outbuf = qstring_new();
> >              return;
>  
> Forgot to cc the maintainer.

I included it in my pull request:

http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-01/msg03859.html

But it seems that I forgot to reply to the patch too.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-01-29 14:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-01-22 15:53 [Qemu-devel] Possible bug in monitor code Stratos Psomadakis
2014-01-23  3:07 ` Fam Zheng
2014-01-23 10:17   ` Stratos Psomadakis
2014-01-24 23:48 ` Luiz Capitulino
2014-01-27 10:30   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Cleanup mon->outbuf on write error Stratos Psomadakis
2014-01-29 10:46     ` Stratos Psomadakis
2014-01-29 14:12       ` Luiz Capitulino

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).