From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37363) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7wDu-0006Ic-Sf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:08:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7wDo-0007Ob-Ob for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:08:14 -0500 Message-ID: <1390867656.3872.35.camel@pasglop> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:07:36 +1100 In-Reply-To: References: <03D15FE3-2A12-4D60-8D20-07D05F3740F6@suse.de> <20140120191919.GH13432@cbox> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] KVM and variable-endianness guest CPUs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Thomas Falcon , kvm-devel , Victor Kamensky , QEMU Developers , "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , Christoffer Dall On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 15:33 +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > (4) PPC CPUs in BE mode and ARM CPUs in BE mode are not > the same, because in the ARM case it is doing an > internal-to-CPU byteswap, and in the PPC case it is not Aren't they both byte-order invariant ? In that case they are the same. Ben.