From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39929) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKSY0-0000pn-ON for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 08:04:50 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKSXu-0006HP-4m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 08:04:44 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14375) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKSXt-0006HG-T1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 08:04:38 -0500 Message-ID: <1393851827.3882.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> From: Marcel Apfelbaum Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:03:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <53147C2C.7090404@redhat.com> References: <1393765632-2753-1-git-send-email-marcel.a@redhat.com> <1393765632-2753-3-git-send-email-marcel.a@redhat.com> <20140303125825.GC6319@redhat.com> <53147C2C.7090404@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC V2 2/9] vl: use qemu machine QOM class instead of global machines list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, blauwirbel@gmail.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, armbru@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, agraf@suse.de, ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.crosthwaite@petalogix.com, quintela@redhat.com, aliguori@amazon.com, imammedo@redhat.com, scottwood@freescale.com, edgar.iglesias@gmail.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de, rth@twiddle.net On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 13:57 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 03/03/2014 13:58, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 03:07:05PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: > >> > The machine registration flow is refactored to use the QOM functionality. > >> > Instead of linking the machines into a list, each machine has a type > >> > and the types can be traversed in the QOM way. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum > > Nice. Thanks! > > > > Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > > > > This patch already looks like a nice cleanup. How about queueing > > this and the preceding patch straight away? > > Which tree is appropriate? I'm guessing QOM? > > > > Fine by me. Thanks! Where can I find the QOM tree? I ask because I will rebase the series on this tree... Marcel > > Paolo