From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] qcow2: Check bs->drv in copy_sectors()
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 23:44:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1394491449-10897-2-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394491449-10897-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com>
Before dereferencing bs->drv for a call to its member bdrv_co_readv(),
copy_sectors() should check whether that pointer is indeed valid, since
it may have been set to NULL by e.g. a concurrent write triggering the
corruption prevention mechanism.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
---
To be precise, this still is a race condition. If bs->drv is set to NULL
after the check and before the call to bdrv_co_readv(), QEMU will
obviously still crash. However, in order to circumvent this behavior, we
would probably have to re-lock s->lock, check bs->drv, take the function
pointer to bdrv_co_readv() and then unlock s->lock before the function
is called. I found this rather ugly and therefore this still has a very
small chance of running into a race condition.
Therefore, I'm asking for your opinion on this, whether we can really
take this chance or should rather "do it right". In fact, if I were a
reviewer, I'd probably reject this patch and request the solution with
the function pointer (if there is no better solution), but I was afraid
to send such an ugly patch.
---
block/qcow2-cluster.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/qcow2-cluster.c b/block/qcow2-cluster.c
index 36c1bed..9499df9 100644
--- a/block/qcow2-cluster.c
+++ b/block/qcow2-cluster.c
@@ -380,6 +380,10 @@ static int coroutine_fn copy_sectors(BlockDriverState *bs,
BLKDBG_EVENT(bs->file, BLKDBG_COW_READ);
+ if (!bs->drv) {
+ return -ENOMEDIUM;
+ }
+
/* Call .bdrv_co_readv() directly instead of using the public block-layer
* interface. This avoids double I/O throttling and request tracking,
* which can lead to deadlock when block layer copy-on-read is enabled.
--
1.9.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-10 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-10 22:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] qcow2: Fix crash during copy_sectors() after corruption Max Reitz
2014-03-10 22:44 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2014-03-10 23:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] qcow2: Check bs->drv in copy_sectors() Laszlo Ersek
2014-03-11 10:16 ` Kevin Wolf
2014-03-11 14:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-11 18:19 ` Max Reitz
2014-03-11 18:09 ` Max Reitz
2014-03-10 22:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] block: bs->drv may be NULL in bdrv_debug_resume() Max Reitz
2014-03-10 22:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] iotests: Test corruption during COW request Max Reitz
2014-03-11 10:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] qcow2: Fix crash during copy_sectors() after corruption Kevin Wolf
2014-03-11 13:13 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1394491449-10897-2-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).