From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
armbru@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de, aliguori@amazon.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] tests: Fix possible deadlock in qtest initialization
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 12:11:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1394532715.3981.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140310191301.GB12263@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 20:13 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 05:21:17PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 16:02 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 02:12:12PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > > 'socket_accept' waits for Qemu to init its unix socket.
> > > > If Qemu encounters an error during command line parsing,
> > > > it can exit before initializing the communication channel.
> > > > It gets worse as the make check-qtest-* gets stuck without
> > > > notifying which test exactly has problems, so debugging can
> > > > be a challenge.
> > > >
> > > > The solution has two parts:
> > > > - Use a timeout for the socket.
> > > > - Expose a qtest_state_valid that checks that the connections
> > > > with Qemu are OK.
> > >
> > > See below why I think qtest_state_valid() is unnecessary as a libqtest.h
> > > API.
> > >
> > > > Asserting qtest_state_valid in each test after qtest_init
> > > > is a must, as we need to trace which test failed.
> > >
> > > Inability to tell which qtest failed is a Makefile problem. The
> > > solution is not to move all asserts to the outer-most level just so the
> > > error message includes the test name.
> > >
> > > Either we need to invoke gtester separately for each test - that way the
> > > Makefile can print "TEST <name>" for each binary. Or maybe gtester has
> > > options for formatting output better.
> > Hi Stefan,
> > Thanks for the review.
> >
> > I am more concerned of PATCH 1/2, because it is a blocker for another series I am working on.
> > I can resend only the first one which adds socket timeout and leaves the original assert.
> > Would you be OK with this?
>
> Yes, that sounds fine. I posted comments on Patch 1 about ensuring the sockets
> are unlinked before we fail (to prevent leaking the UNIX domain socket nodes in
> the file system) - it does involve moving the assert to qtest_init().
Hi Stefan,
Thanks a lot for your help! I already sent V2.
>
> > Now regarding the issue you brought up (less important):
> > - Tweaking the Makefile to run each qtest separately and not all tests per arch
> > is a viable solution, however I am not familiar with the makefile magic and
> > it will take me a lot of time to get into it.
>
> The following produces per-test output. This means you'll know which test failed:
Yes, it works like a charm! I added it :)
Thanks,
Marcel
>
> diff --git a/tests/Makefile b/tests/Makefile
> index b17d41e..a8405c8 100644
> --- a/tests/Makefile
> +++ b/tests/Makefile
> @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ check-help:
> @echo "changed with variable GTESTER_OPTIONS."
>
> SPEED = quick
> -GTESTER_OPTIONS = -k $(if $(V),--verbose,-q)
> +GTESTER_OPTIONS = -k #$(if $(V),--verbose,-q)
> GCOV_OPTIONS = -n $(if $(V),-f,)
>
> # gtester tests, possibly with verbose output
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-11 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-10 12:12 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] tests: Fix possible deadlock in qtest initialization Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-10 12:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tests/libqtest: " Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-10 19:02 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-03-12 9:42 ` Markus Armbruster
2014-03-12 9:54 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-10 12:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tests: check that qtest state is valid before starting the test Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-10 15:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] tests: Fix possible deadlock in qtest initialization Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-03-10 15:21 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-10 19:13 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-03-11 10:11 ` Marcel Apfelbaum [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1394532715.3981.25.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=marcel.a@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@amazon.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).