From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49391) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WNLmj-0005AG-0a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 08:27:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WNLmc-000569-Cb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 08:27:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WNLmc-000564-4w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 08:27:46 -0400 Message-ID: <1394540823.3981.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> From: Marcel Apfelbaum Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:27:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <531EFC81.5000703@redhat.com> References: <1394532550-21857-1-git-send-email-marcel.a@redhat.com> <1394532550-21857-3-git-send-email-marcel.a@redhat.com> <531EFC81.5000703@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/2] tests: Tweak the Makefile to produce per-test output. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, aliguori@amazon.com, armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 06:07 -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 03/11/2014 04:09 AM, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: > > From: Stefan Hajnoczi > > > > The effect is that the output will grow, but we will know > > which qtest failed. This helps when an asert is made on > > s/asert/assert/ Sure, > > > other code and not in the test itself. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi > > Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum > > --- > > tests/Makefile | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tests/Makefile b/tests/Makefile > > index b17d41e..a8405c8 100644 > > --- a/tests/Makefile > > +++ b/tests/Makefile > > @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ check-help: > > @echo "changed with variable GTESTER_OPTIONS." > > > > SPEED = quick > > -GTESTER_OPTIONS = -k $(if $(V),--verbose,-q) > > +GTESTER_OPTIONS = -k #$(if $(V),--verbose,-q) > > Isn't this effectively commenting out the rest of the line? If so, why > not delete everything after the #? Hi Eric, thank you for catching this. Indeed, what I actually want to do is to remove the -q flag. I sent V3 that fixes this, Thanks, Marcel >