From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59605)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <marcel.a@redhat.com>) id 1WPBIq-0001ld-Cz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 09:40:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <marcel.a@redhat.com>) id 1WPBIl-0004AW-Ke
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 09:40:36 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46215)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <marcel.a@redhat.com>) id 1WPBIl-0004AK-Cp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 09:40:31 -0400
Message-ID: <1394977234.3981.105.camel@localhost.localdomain>
From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:40:34 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8OmKaKncCf7hDEQP6arQ3L=t8QPSMcgyzPcc4XNADwhA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5325A5B0.1080102@comstyle.com>
	<CAFEAcA8OmKaKncCf7hDEQP6arQ3L=t8QPSMcgyzPcc4XNADwhA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU build broken
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Andreas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>, Brad Smith <brad@comstyle.com>

On Sun, 2014-03-16 at 13:26 +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 March 2014 13:22, Brad Smith <brad@comstyle.com> wrote:
> > Commit 0056ae24bc36798fdd96d0b31e217e9f73896736 broke the build of QEMU and
> > this affects the 2.0.0 release too.
> >
> > http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu/builders/default_openbsd_current/builds/700/steps/compile/logs/stdio
> > http://buildbot.b1-systems.de/qemu/builders/default_openbsd_4.9/builds/891/steps/compile/logs/stdio
> >
> > MACHINE and MACHINE_ARCH are used to indicate the meta arch and
> > hardware architecture.
> 
> Can we limit the set of system headers we're pulling in to
> avoid the header where OpenBSD is defining this? Generally
> for specific headers that clash it's nicer to just limit those to
> whatever file really needed those defines. I'm assuming it's
> not pulled in by one of the POSIX headers...
It will be really nice if we could do that,
otherwise I need to get creative and find a suitable name for the machine type.
By the way, do we have some standard QOM prefixes/suffixes for collisions like this?

Thanks,
Marcel

> 
> thanks
> -- PMM