From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44214) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrMnM-0001N7-Fz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 03:36:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrMnG-0005Vt-Bc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 03:36:36 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:2290) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrMnG-0005Vn-3V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 03:36:30 -0400 Message-ID: <1401694580.22391.10.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:36:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1401452542-11080-2-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> References: <1401452542-11080-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> <1401452542-11080-2-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] usb: add usb_bus_release function List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: arei.gonglei@huawei.com Cc: weidong.huang@huawei.com, luonengjun@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com Hi, > +void usb_bus_release(USBBus *bus) > +{ > + assert(next_usb_bus > 0); > + > + next_usb_bus--; > + QTAILQ_REMOVE(&busses, bus, next); > +} That breaks when not hotplugging in last-in-first-out order. I'd suggest to simply leave next_usb_bus alone on unplug. It is only used for bus numbering. We'll get holes in our bus numbering then, but we can't avoid that with hotplug anyway. cheers, Gerd