From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49516)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1WuGzX-00005Q-Tg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 04:01:18 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1WuGzR-0005xU-P1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 04:01:11 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1246)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1WuGzR-0005xM-8P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 04:01:05 -0400
Message-ID: <1402387234.8739.20.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org>
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 10:00:34 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87lhtadljv.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
References: <1402072513-7001-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
	<5391EFAA.6020602@redhat.com> <87lhtadljv.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] audio: Drop superfluous conditionals
 around g_free()
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: av1474@comtv.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

  Hi,

> Gerd, should patches for audio/ conform to the usual style now, or are
> they still special?

I don't consider them special.  If you use usual qemu style in patches
that is fine with me.  But I don't feel like doing a conversion pass,
that simply isn't worth the trouble IMO.

cheers,
  Gerd