From: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] hw/pcie: implement power controller functionality
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 14:17:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1403435851.2109.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140622111118.GA27736@redhat.com>
On Sun, 2014-06-22 at 14:11 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 01:52:46PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 01:47:24PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 17:39 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 04:52:20PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > > > It is needed by hot-unplug in order to get an indication
> > > > > from the OS when the device can be physically detached.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a@redhat.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > hw/pci/pcie.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> > > > > include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h | 2 ++
> > > > > 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c
> > > > > index ae92f00..f8bf515 100644
> > > > > --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c
> > > > > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c
> > > > > @@ -292,16 +292,19 @@ void pcie_cap_slot_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t slot)
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC |
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_PIP |
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_AIP |
> > > > > + PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_PCP |
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_ABP);
> > > > >
> > > > > pci_word_test_and_clear_mask(dev->config + pos + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL,
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC |
> > > > > + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC |
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_AIC);
> > > > > pci_word_test_and_set_mask(dev->config + pos + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL,
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_OFF |
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_AIC_OFF);
> > > > > pci_word_test_and_set_mask(dev->wmask + pos + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL,
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC |
> > > > > + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC |
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_AIC |
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_HPIE |
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_CCIE |
> > > >
> > > > Need to disable for compat types?
> > > Does Paolo's explanation answer your question?
> >
> > Kind of hacky - we do have compat work for
> > q35. So I'd prefer consistency.
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > @@ -327,21 +330,31 @@ void pcie_cap_slot_init(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t slot)
> > > > > void pcie_cap_slot_reset(PCIDevice *dev)
> > > > > {
> > > > > uint8_t *exp_cap = dev->config + dev->exp.exp_cap;
> > > > > + PCIDevice *slot_dev = pci_bridge_get_sec_bus(PCI_BRIDGE(dev))->devices[0];
> > > >
> > > > What does this mean?
> > > > Downstream port?
> > > Yes
> >
> > well it's not really clear, needs a comment.
> >
> > > > A switch can have multiple downstream ports at any slot #.
> > > It doesn't matter how many devices are under this slot, we need only
> > > one to power up the slot. The question here was "Do we have at least
> > > one device attahc to slot? If yes, power up the slot."
> >
> > You need a loop for that I think. There's no guarantee the
> > device is at devfn=0.
>
> Unless something guarantees this is a downstream port,
> if yes maybe add an assert?
> slot_dev is also not a very good variable name.
> How about
> bool populated = pci_bridge_get_sec_bus(PCI_BRIDGE(dev))->devices[0];
> ?
> This is all you care about ...
> And maybe add a comment
> /* Downstream ports enforce device number 0. */
I'll use that, thanks!
Marcel
>
> > > >
> > > > > + int pic;
> > > >
> > > > uint16_t please.
> > > Sure,
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > +
> > > > > + pic = slot_dev ? PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_ON : PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_OFF;
> > > > >
> > > > > PCIE_DEV_PRINTF(dev, "reset\n");
> > > > >
> > > > > pci_word_test_and_clear_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL,
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_EIC |
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC |
> > > > > + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC |
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_AIC |
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_HPIE |
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_CCIE |
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PDCE |
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_ABPE);
> > > > > pci_word_test_and_set_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL,
> > > > > - PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_OFF |
> > > > > + pic |
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_AIC_OFF);
> > > > >
> > > > > + if (!slot_dev) {
> > > > > + pci_word_test_and_set_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL,
> > > > > + PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC);
> > > >
> > > > I dislike it when we clear bits then set them back.
> > > > Please just add else here.
> > > Sure,
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > Need to disable for compat types?
> > > As above,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the review,
> > > Marcel
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > pci_word_test_and_clear_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA,
> > > > > PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_EIS |/* on reset,
> > > > > the lock is released */
> > > > > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h b/include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h
> > > > > index 4d123d9..652d9fc 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h
> > > > > @@ -57,6 +57,8 @@
> > > > > #define PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_SHIFT (ffs(PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC) - 1)
> > > > > #define PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_OFF \
> > > > > (PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_IND_OFF << PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_SHIFT)
> > > > > +#define PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_ON \
> > > > > + (PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_IND_ON << PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_SHIFT)
> > > > >
> > > > > #define PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_SUPPORTED \
> > > > > (PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_ABPE | \
> > > > > --
> > > > > 1.8.3.1
> > >
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-22 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-19 13:52 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] hw/pcie: better hotplug/hotunplug support Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-06-19 13:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] hw/pcie: corrected a debug message Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-06-19 13:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] hw/pcie: implement power controller functionality Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-06-19 14:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-19 20:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-22 10:47 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-06-22 10:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-22 11:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-22 11:17 ` Marcel Apfelbaum [this message]
2014-06-19 13:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] hw/pcie: better hotplug/hotunplug support Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-06-19 14:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-22 10:54 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-06-22 11:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-22 11:11 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-06-22 11:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-06-22 11:24 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1403435851.2109.14.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=marcel.a@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).