From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51346)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vrozenfe@redhat.com>) id 1XExx9-00030j-IC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 05:56:21 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vrozenfe@redhat.com>) id 1XExx3-0000nx-EI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 05:56:15 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40177)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vrozenfe@redhat.com>) id 1XExx3-0000ll-7R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 05:56:09 -0400
Message-ID: <1407318957.11187.2.camel@oscar>
From: Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 19:55:57 +1000
In-Reply-To: <201408041429531176607@sangfor.com>
References: <201406300939223611342@sangfor.com>
	, <1404122529.28960.24.camel@localhost>,
	<201406301945131268456@sangfor.com>
	, <1404130690.28960.39.camel@localhost>,
	<201408041017396729221@sangfor.com>
	<201408041429531176607@sangfor.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [questions] about KVM
 asaMicrosoft-compatiblehypervisor
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Zhang Haoyu <zhanghy@sangfor.com>
Cc: Jidong Xiao <jidong.xiao@gmail.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 14:29 +0800, Zhang Haoyu wrote:
> >Hi Zhang,
> >
> >No I haven't seen such problem
> >Which kernel version are you running?
> Host kernel: RHEL7-RC1(linux-3.10.0).
> 
> >Does it include the latest lazy eli changes?
> >
> lazy eli or lazy eoi?
EOI
> How to confirm whether lazy eli has been included?
> 
not in linux-3.10.0
> >Btw, hv_spinlocks=0xfffffff is a pretty huge value.
> >
> which value do you advise to use?
MS seems to be using 0xffff as a default.
best regards,
Vadim.
> 
> Thanks,
> Zhang Haoyu
> >Best regards,
> >Vadim.
> 
>