From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XIFkX-0002VC-JY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 07:32:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XIFkO-0008MO-Jy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 07:32:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41458) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XIFkO-0008KN-Bg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 07:32:40 -0400 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7FBWd13025464 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 07:32:39 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 13:32:35 +0200 Message-Id: <1408102357-914-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Fix latent(?) bootindex bugs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, lersek@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com I put (?) behind latent, because I didn't actually prove the reason it can't bite USB I put forward in PATCH 1. PATCH 1 should be picked up by the USB maintainer (Kraxel), and PATCH 2 by a block maintainer (Kevin or Stefan). I'm posting this as a series regardless, because I want them reviewed together. Related: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH v3] boot: Fix boot order for SCSI target, lun > 9 http://www.seabios.org/pipermail/seabios/2014-August/008205.html RHBZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096560 Markus Armbruster (2): usb: Fix bootindex for portnr > 9 ide: Fix bootindex for bus_id > 9 hw/ide/qdev.c | 2 +- hw/usb/bus.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 1.9.3