From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47169) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNC9L-0004Jl-AR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:43:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNC96-0008Sc-5a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:42:51 -0400 Received: from e23smtp01.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.143]:43204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XNC95-0008SS-H5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:42:36 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp01.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:42:32 +1000 Message-ID: <1409280149.17335.29.camel@pasglop> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 12:42:29 +1000 In-Reply-To: References: <20140825134353.2361.52046.stgit@aravindap> <20140825134516.2361.32987.stgit@aravindap> <53FF0732.6090008@suse.de> <53FF72DD.5010009@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <53FFAAC4.2050408@suse.de> <1409264725.17335.23.camel@pasglop> <53FFCBEC.6030703@suse.de> <1409274364.17335.28.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/5] target-ppc: Extend rtas-blob List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: "aik@au1.ibm.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" , Aravinda Prasad , "paulus@samba.org" On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 03:33 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > I fail to see a problem, yeah :). Imagine the same thing on x86 with > its completely messed up instruction set. Would you still advocate for > in-qemu code or would you prefer to have a compiler between you and > the ugly opcodes? You mean an assembler ? :-) Cheers, Ben.