qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>,
	mst@redhat.com, hutao@cn.fujitsu.com, luonengjun@huawei.com,
	peter.huangpeng@huawei.com, imammedo@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vl: Adjust the place of calling mlockall to speedup VM's startup
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:57:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1411459067-840-1-git-send-email-zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com> (raw)

If we configure mlock=on and memory policy=bind at the same time,
It will consume lots of time for system to treat with memory,
especially when call mbind after mlockall.

Adjust the place of calling mlockall, calling mbind before mlockall
can remarkably reduce the time of VM's startup.

Signed-off-by: zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>
---
Hi,

Actually, for mbind and mlockall, i have made a test about the time consuming 
for the different call sequence. 

The results is shown below. It is obviously that mlockall called before mbind is 
more time-consuming.

Besides, this patch is OK with memory hotplug.

TEST CODE:
    if (mbind_first) {
        printf("mbind --> mlockall\n");
        mbind(ptr, ram_size/2, MPOL_BIND, &node0mask, 2,
              MPOL_MF_STRICT | MPOL_MF_MOVE);
        mbind(ptr + ram_size/2, ram_size/2, MPOL_BIND, &node1mask, 2,
              MPOL_MF_STRICT | MPOL_MF_MOVE);
        mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE);
    } else {
        printf("mlockall --> mbind\n");
        mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE);
        mbind(ptr, ram_size/2, MPOL_BIND, &node0mask, 2 ,
              MPOL_MF_STRICT | MPOL_MF_MOVE);
        mbind(ptr + ram_size/2, ram_size/2, MPOL_BIND, &node1mask, 2,
              MPOL_MF_STRICT | MPOL_MF_MOVE);
    }

RESULT 1:
#time /home/test_mbind 10240 0
memroy size 10737418240
mlockall --> mbind

real    0m11.886s
user    0m0.004s
sys     0m11.865s
#time /home/test_mbind 10240 1
memroy size 10737418240
mbind --> mlockall

real    0m5.334s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m5.324s

RESULT 2:
#time /home/test_mbind 4096 0
memroy size 4294967296
mlockall --> mbind

real    0m5.503s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m5.492s
#time /home/test_mbind 4096 1
memroy size 4294967296
mbind --> mlockall

real    0m2.139s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m2.132s

Best Regards,
zhanghailiang
---
 vl.c | 11 +++++------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
index dc792fe..adf4770 100644
--- a/vl.c
+++ b/vl.c
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ const char* keyboard_layout = NULL;
 ram_addr_t ram_size;
 const char *mem_path = NULL;
 int mem_prealloc = 0; /* force preallocation of physical target memory */
+int enable_mlock = false;
 int nb_nics;
 NICInfo nd_table[MAX_NICS];
 int autostart;
@@ -1421,12 +1422,8 @@ static void smp_parse(QemuOpts *opts)
 
 }
 
-static void configure_realtime(QemuOpts *opts)
+static void realtime_init(void)
 {
-    bool enable_mlock;
-
-    enable_mlock = qemu_opt_get_bool(opts, "mlock", true);
-
     if (enable_mlock) {
         if (os_mlock() < 0) {
             fprintf(stderr, "qemu: locking memory failed\n");
@@ -3973,7 +3970,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
                 if (!opts) {
                     exit(1);
                 }
-                configure_realtime(opts);
+                enable_mlock = qemu_opt_get_bool(opts, "mlock", true);
                 break;
             case QEMU_OPTION_msg:
                 opts = qemu_opts_parse(qemu_find_opts("msg"), optarg, 0);
@@ -4441,6 +4438,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
 
     machine_class->init(current_machine);
 
+    realtime_init();
+
     audio_init();
 
     cpu_synchronize_all_post_init();
-- 
1.7.12.4

             reply	other threads:[~2014-09-23  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-23  7:57 zhanghailiang [this message]
2014-09-23  8:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vl: Adjust the place of calling mlockall to speedup VM's startup Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-09-23  8:35   ` Hu Tao
2014-09-23  9:06     ` zhanghailiang
2014-09-23 10:19   ` zhanghailiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1411459067-840-1-git-send-email-zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
    --to=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=hutao@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=luonengjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.huangpeng@huawei.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).