From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>, "Stefan Weil" <sw@weilnetz.de>,
"Max Reitz" <mreitz@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@nodalink.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] block/vdi: Fix bmap writing error
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 10:51:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1413881486-24710-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> (raw)
The bmap size in block/vdi.c may exceed INT_MAX. Using
bdrv_pwrite_sync() (which takes an int byte count) is therefore not a
good idea. The second patch of this series fixes this by replacing
bdrv_pwrite_sync() by bdrv_write()+bdrv_flush() (we don't need the p in
pwrite here).
The first patch employs ROUND_UP() and DIV_ROUND_UP() in block/vdi.c, so
you are reminded that bmap_size is aligned to BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE for the
second patch.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154940 for a bug
report.
I will not include an iotest in this series because this would require
qemu to allocate and then write about 2G of data; yes, test 1 in 084
fails for me because qemu cannot allocate 4G for the bmap.
In fact, I can only test this once I'm home where I have more RAM
available (I made the mistake of activating swap space to test this only
once).
Max Reitz (2):
block/vdi: Use {DIV_,}ROUND_UP
block/vdi: Do not use bdrv_pwrite_sync() for bmap
block/vdi.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
1.9.3
next reply other threads:[~2014-10-21 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-21 8:51 Max Reitz [this message]
2014-10-21 8:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] block/vdi: Use {DIV_,}ROUND_UP Max Reitz
2014-10-21 16:58 ` Eric Blake
2014-10-21 8:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] block/vdi: Do not use bdrv_pwrite_sync() for bmap Max Reitz
2014-10-21 17:00 ` Eric Blake
2014-10-22 11:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] block/vdi: Fix bmap writing error Kevin Wolf
2014-10-23 7:07 ` Max Reitz
2014-10-23 7:07 ` Max Reitz
2014-10-23 13:24 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1413881486-24710-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=benoit.canet@nodalink.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).