From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55343) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgXJq-0000Qa-Sf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 07:09:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgXJi-0004Le-5F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 07:09:38 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33195) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XgXJh-0004LR-U8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 07:09:30 -0400 Message-ID: <1413889759.14632.17.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:09:19 +0200 In-Reply-To: <544556A1.3020405@redhat.com> References: <1413796790-30579-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com> <20141020141548.GA11062@redhat.com> <544556A1.3020405@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: Default to --no-git-fallback List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: QEMU Developers , Peter Maydell , Markus Armbruster , "Michael S. Tsirkin" On Mo, 2014-10-20 at 20:38 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 10/20/2014 04:15 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > What do you want to happen in this case? > > Won't this cause even more patches to fall to the floor? > > > > The benefit seems marginal, the risk high. > > I agree with Michael. > > Can we detect if get_maintainer.pl is invoked as a cccmd, and in this > case default to --no-git-fallback? If it is invoked manually, I would > like to show the committers (I will then cherry pick the right ones). How about making "get_maintainer.pl --git-fallback" actually do what it says? Right now git it *not* used as fallback, it goes to git log unconditionally, even if there are hits in MAINTAINERS ... Different behavior depending on whenever stdout is a tty or not should be doable too. cheers, Gerd