From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53901) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XiJPe-0000ow-9J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 04:43:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XiJPX-0005Gw-08 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 04:42:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58145) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XiJPW-0005Gj-QF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 04:42:50 -0400 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s9Q8gm4E012588 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 26 Oct 2014 04:42:48 -0400 From: "Richard W.M. Jones" Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 08:42:37 +0000 Message-Id: <1414312958-21967-1-git-send-email-rjones@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 repost 2] block/curl: Improve type safety of s->timeout. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, lersek@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com No change since previous repost, except I have rebased it against git head. Three line change for obvious bug. Can I get another review? Previous discussion: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-10/threads.html#00518 Rich.