* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] linux-aio: fix batch submission @ 2014-11-06 15:09 Ming Lei 2014-11-06 15:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] linux-aio: fix submit aio as a batch Ming Lei ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Ming Lei @ 2014-11-06 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel, Peter Maydell, Paolo Bonzini, Stefan Hajnoczi, Kevin Wolf Cc: Benoît Canet The 1st patch fixes batch submission. The 2nd one fixes -EAGAIN for non-batch case. The 3rd one is a cleanup. This patchset is splitted from previous patchset(dataplane: optimization and multi virtqueue support), as suggested by Stefan. v3: - rebase on QEMU master v2: - code style fix and commit log fix as suggested by Benoît Canet v1: - rebase on latest QEMU master block/linux-aio.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) Thanks, ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] linux-aio: fix submit aio as a batch 2014-11-06 15:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] linux-aio: fix batch submission Ming Lei @ 2014-11-06 15:09 ` Ming Lei 2014-11-18 14:18 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-11-06 15:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] linux-aio: handling -EAGAIN for !s->io_q.plugged case Ming Lei 2014-11-06 15:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] linux-aio: remove 'node' from 'struct qemu_laiocb' Ming Lei 2 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Ming Lei @ 2014-11-06 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel, Peter Maydell, Paolo Bonzini, Stefan Hajnoczi, Kevin Wolf Cc: Benoît Canet, Ming Lei In the enqueue path, we can't complete request, otherwise "Co-routine re-entered recursively" may be caused, so this patch fixes the issue with below ideas: - for -EAGAIN or partial completion, retry the submision by schedule an BH in following completion cb - for part of completion, also update the io queue - for other failure, return the failure if in enqueue path, otherwise, abort all queued I/O Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> --- block/linux-aio.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/linux-aio.c b/block/linux-aio.c index d92513b..f66e8ad 100644 --- a/block/linux-aio.c +++ b/block/linux-aio.c @@ -38,11 +38,19 @@ struct qemu_laiocb { QLIST_ENTRY(qemu_laiocb) node; }; +/* + * TODO: support to batch I/O from multiple bs in one same + * AIO context, one important use case is multi-lun scsi, + * so in future the IO queue should be per AIO context. + */ typedef struct { struct iocb *iocbs[MAX_QUEUED_IO]; int plugged; unsigned int size; unsigned int idx; + + /* handle -EAGAIN and partial completion */ + QEMUBH *retry; } LaioQueue; struct qemu_laio_state { @@ -137,6 +145,12 @@ static void qemu_laio_completion_bh(void *opaque) } } +static void qemu_laio_start_retry(struct qemu_laio_state *s) +{ + if (s->io_q.idx) + qemu_bh_schedule(s->io_q.retry); +} + static void qemu_laio_completion_cb(EventNotifier *e) { struct qemu_laio_state *s = container_of(e, struct qemu_laio_state, e); @@ -144,6 +158,7 @@ static void qemu_laio_completion_cb(EventNotifier *e) if (event_notifier_test_and_clear(&s->e)) { qemu_bh_schedule(s->completion_bh); } + qemu_laio_start_retry(s); } static void laio_cancel(BlockAIOCB *blockacb) @@ -163,6 +178,9 @@ static void laio_cancel(BlockAIOCB *blockacb) } laiocb->common.cb(laiocb->common.opaque, laiocb->ret); + + /* check if there are requests in io queue */ + qemu_laio_start_retry(laiocb->ctx); } static const AIOCBInfo laio_aiocb_info = { @@ -177,45 +195,80 @@ static void ioq_init(LaioQueue *io_q) io_q->plugged = 0; } -static int ioq_submit(struct qemu_laio_state *s) +static void abort_queue(struct qemu_laio_state *s) +{ + int i; + for (i = 0; i < s->io_q.idx; i++) { + struct qemu_laiocb *laiocb = container_of(s->io_q.iocbs[i], + struct qemu_laiocb, + iocb); + laiocb->ret = -EIO; + qemu_laio_process_completion(s, laiocb); + } +} + +static int ioq_submit(struct qemu_laio_state *s, bool enqueue) { int ret, i = 0; int len = s->io_q.idx; + int j = 0; - do { - ret = io_submit(s->ctx, len, s->io_q.iocbs); - } while (i++ < 3 && ret == -EAGAIN); + if (!len) { + return 0; + } - /* empty io queue */ - s->io_q.idx = 0; + ret = io_submit(s->ctx, len, s->io_q.iocbs); + if (ret == -EAGAIN) { /* retry in following completion cb */ + return 0; + } else if (ret < 0) { + if (enqueue) { + return ret; + } - if (ret < 0) { - i = 0; - } else { - i = ret; + /* in non-queue path, all IOs have to be completed */ + abort_queue(s); + ret = len; + } else if (ret == 0) { + goto out; } - for (; i < len; i++) { - struct qemu_laiocb *laiocb = - container_of(s->io_q.iocbs[i], struct qemu_laiocb, iocb); - - laiocb->ret = (ret < 0) ? ret : -EIO; - qemu_laio_process_completion(s, laiocb); + for (i = ret; i < len; i++) { + s->io_q.iocbs[j++] = s->io_q.iocbs[i]; } + + out: + /* + * update io queue, for partial completion, retry will be + * started automatically in following completion cb. + */ + s->io_q.idx -= ret; + return ret; } -static void ioq_enqueue(struct qemu_laio_state *s, struct iocb *iocb) +static void ioq_submit_retry(void *opaque) +{ + struct qemu_laio_state *s = opaque; + ioq_submit(s, false); +} + +static int ioq_enqueue(struct qemu_laio_state *s, struct iocb *iocb) { unsigned int idx = s->io_q.idx; + if (unlikely(idx == s->io_q.size)) { + return -1; + } + s->io_q.iocbs[idx++] = iocb; s->io_q.idx = idx; - /* submit immediately if queue is full */ - if (idx == s->io_q.size) { - ioq_submit(s); + /* submit immediately if queue depth is above 2/3 */ + if (idx > s->io_q.size * 2 / 3) { + return ioq_submit(s, true); } + + return 0; } void laio_io_plug(BlockDriverState *bs, void *aio_ctx) @@ -237,7 +290,7 @@ int laio_io_unplug(BlockDriverState *bs, void *aio_ctx, bool unplug) } if (s->io_q.idx > 0) { - ret = ioq_submit(s); + ret = ioq_submit(s, false); } return ret; @@ -281,7 +334,9 @@ BlockAIOCB *laio_submit(BlockDriverState *bs, void *aio_ctx, int fd, goto out_free_aiocb; } } else { - ioq_enqueue(s, iocbs); + if (ioq_enqueue(s, iocbs) < 0) { + goto out_free_aiocb; + } } return &laiocb->common; @@ -296,12 +351,14 @@ void laio_detach_aio_context(void *s_, AioContext *old_context) aio_set_event_notifier(old_context, &s->e, NULL); qemu_bh_delete(s->completion_bh); + qemu_bh_delete(s->io_q.retry); } void laio_attach_aio_context(void *s_, AioContext *new_context) { struct qemu_laio_state *s = s_; + s->io_q.retry = aio_bh_new(new_context, ioq_submit_retry, s); s->completion_bh = aio_bh_new(new_context, qemu_laio_completion_bh, s); aio_set_event_notifier(new_context, &s->e, qemu_laio_completion_cb); } -- 1.7.9.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] linux-aio: fix submit aio as a batch 2014-11-06 15:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] linux-aio: fix submit aio as a batch Ming Lei @ 2014-11-18 14:18 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-11-22 12:16 ` Ming Lei 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-11-18 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ming Lei, qemu-devel, Peter Maydell, Stefan Hajnoczi, Kevin Wolf Cc: Benoît Canet > @@ -137,6 +145,12 @@ static void qemu_laio_completion_bh(void *opaque) > } > } > > +static void qemu_laio_start_retry(struct qemu_laio_state *s) > +{ > + if (s->io_q.idx) > + qemu_bh_schedule(s->io_q.retry); > +} > + > static void qemu_laio_completion_cb(EventNotifier *e) > { > struct qemu_laio_state *s = container_of(e, struct qemu_laio_state, e); > @@ -144,6 +158,7 @@ static void qemu_laio_completion_cb(EventNotifier *e) > if (event_notifier_test_and_clear(&s->e)) { > qemu_bh_schedule(s->completion_bh); > } > + qemu_laio_start_retry(s); I think you do not even need two bottom halves. Just call ioq_submit from completion_bh instead, after the call to io_getevents. > } > > static void laio_cancel(BlockAIOCB *blockacb) > @@ -163,6 +178,9 @@ static void laio_cancel(BlockAIOCB *blockacb) > } > > laiocb->common.cb(laiocb->common.opaque, laiocb->ret); > + > + /* check if there are requests in io queue */ > + qemu_laio_start_retry(laiocb->ctx); > } > > static const AIOCBInfo laio_aiocb_info = { > @@ -177,45 +195,80 @@ static void ioq_init(LaioQueue *io_q) > io_q->plugged = 0; > } > > -static int ioq_submit(struct qemu_laio_state *s) > +static void abort_queue(struct qemu_laio_state *s) > +{ > + int i; > + for (i = 0; i < s->io_q.idx; i++) { > + struct qemu_laiocb *laiocb = container_of(s->io_q.iocbs[i], > + struct qemu_laiocb, > + iocb); > + laiocb->ret = -EIO; > + qemu_laio_process_completion(s, laiocb); > + } > +} > + > +static int ioq_submit(struct qemu_laio_state *s, bool enqueue) > { > int ret, i = 0; > int len = s->io_q.idx; > + int j = 0; > > - do { > - ret = io_submit(s->ctx, len, s->io_q.iocbs); > - } while (i++ < 3 && ret == -EAGAIN); > + if (!len) { > + return 0; > + } > > - /* empty io queue */ > - s->io_q.idx = 0; > + ret = io_submit(s->ctx, len, s->io_q.iocbs); > + if (ret == -EAGAIN) { /* retry in following completion cb */ > + return 0; > + } else if (ret < 0) { > + if (enqueue) { > + return ret; > + } > > - if (ret < 0) { > - i = 0; > - } else { > - i = ret; > + /* in non-queue path, all IOs have to be completed */ > + abort_queue(s); > + ret = len; > + } else if (ret == 0) { > + goto out; No need for goto; just move the "for" loop inside this conditional. Or better, just use memmove. That is: if (ret < 0) { if (ret == -EAGAIN) { return 0; } if (enqueue) { return ret; } abort_queue(s); ret = len; } if (ret > 0) { memmove(...) s->io_q.idx -= ret; } return ret; > + * update io queue, for partial completion, retry will be > + * started automatically in following completion cb. > + */ > + s->io_q.idx -= ret; > + > return ret; > } > > -static void ioq_enqueue(struct qemu_laio_state *s, struct iocb *iocb) > +static void ioq_submit_retry(void *opaque) > +{ > + struct qemu_laio_state *s = opaque; > + ioq_submit(s, false); > +} > + > +static int ioq_enqueue(struct qemu_laio_state *s, struct iocb *iocb) > { > unsigned int idx = s->io_q.idx; > > + if (unlikely(idx == s->io_q.size)) { > + return -1; return -EAGAIN? Thanks, Paolo > + } > + > s->io_q.iocbs[idx++] = iocb; > s->io_q.idx = idx; > > - /* submit immediately if queue is full */ > - if (idx == s->io_q.size) { > - ioq_submit(s); > + /* submit immediately if queue depth is above 2/3 */ > + if (idx > s->io_q.size * 2 / 3) { > + return ioq_submit(s, true); > } > + > + return 0; > } > > void laio_io_plug(BlockDriverState *bs, void *aio_ctx) > @@ -237,7 +290,7 @@ int laio_io_unplug(BlockDriverState *bs, void *aio_ctx, bool unplug) > } > > if (s->io_q.idx > 0) { > - ret = ioq_submit(s); > + ret = ioq_submit(s, false); > } > > return ret; > @@ -281,7 +334,9 @@ BlockAIOCB *laio_submit(BlockDriverState *bs, void *aio_ctx, int fd, > goto out_free_aiocb; > } > } else { > - ioq_enqueue(s, iocbs); > + if (ioq_enqueue(s, iocbs) < 0) { > + goto out_free_aiocb; > + } > } > return &laiocb->common; > > @@ -296,12 +351,14 @@ void laio_detach_aio_context(void *s_, AioContext *old_context) > > aio_set_event_notifier(old_context, &s->e, NULL); > qemu_bh_delete(s->completion_bh); > + qemu_bh_delete(s->io_q.retry); > } > > void laio_attach_aio_context(void *s_, AioContext *new_context) > { > struct qemu_laio_state *s = s_; > > + s->io_q.retry = aio_bh_new(new_context, ioq_submit_retry, s); > s->completion_bh = aio_bh_new(new_context, qemu_laio_completion_bh, s); > aio_set_event_notifier(new_context, &s->e, qemu_laio_completion_cb); > } > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] linux-aio: fix submit aio as a batch 2014-11-18 14:18 ` Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-11-22 12:16 ` Ming Lei 2014-11-24 9:47 ` Paolo Bonzini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Ming Lei @ 2014-11-22 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Kevin Wolf, Peter Maydell, Benoît Canet, qemu-devel, Stefan Hajnoczi On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: > > >> @@ -137,6 +145,12 @@ static void qemu_laio_completion_bh(void *opaque) >> } >> } >> >> +static void qemu_laio_start_retry(struct qemu_laio_state *s) >> +{ >> + if (s->io_q.idx) >> + qemu_bh_schedule(s->io_q.retry); >> +} >> + >> static void qemu_laio_completion_cb(EventNotifier *e) >> { >> struct qemu_laio_state *s = container_of(e, struct qemu_laio_state, e); >> @@ -144,6 +158,7 @@ static void qemu_laio_completion_cb(EventNotifier *e) >> if (event_notifier_test_and_clear(&s->e)) { >> qemu_bh_schedule(s->completion_bh); >> } >> + qemu_laio_start_retry(s); > > I think you do not even need two bottom halves. Just call ioq_submit > from completion_bh instead, after the call to io_getevents. Yes, that can save one BH, actually the patch was written when there wasn't completion BH, :-) > >> } >> >> static void laio_cancel(BlockAIOCB *blockacb) >> @@ -163,6 +178,9 @@ static void laio_cancel(BlockAIOCB *blockacb) >> } >> >> laiocb->common.cb(laiocb->common.opaque, laiocb->ret); >> + >> + /* check if there are requests in io queue */ >> + qemu_laio_start_retry(laiocb->ctx); >> } >> >> static const AIOCBInfo laio_aiocb_info = { >> @@ -177,45 +195,80 @@ static void ioq_init(LaioQueue *io_q) >> io_q->plugged = 0; >> } >> >> -static int ioq_submit(struct qemu_laio_state *s) >> +static void abort_queue(struct qemu_laio_state *s) >> +{ >> + int i; >> + for (i = 0; i < s->io_q.idx; i++) { >> + struct qemu_laiocb *laiocb = container_of(s->io_q.iocbs[i], >> + struct qemu_laiocb, >> + iocb); >> + laiocb->ret = -EIO; >> + qemu_laio_process_completion(s, laiocb); >> + } >> +} >> + >> +static int ioq_submit(struct qemu_laio_state *s, bool enqueue) >> { >> int ret, i = 0; >> int len = s->io_q.idx; >> + int j = 0; >> >> - do { >> - ret = io_submit(s->ctx, len, s->io_q.iocbs); >> - } while (i++ < 3 && ret == -EAGAIN); >> + if (!len) { >> + return 0; >> + } >> >> - /* empty io queue */ >> - s->io_q.idx = 0; >> + ret = io_submit(s->ctx, len, s->io_q.iocbs); >> + if (ret == -EAGAIN) { /* retry in following completion cb */ >> + return 0; >> + } else if (ret < 0) { >> + if (enqueue) { >> + return ret; >> + } >> >> - if (ret < 0) { >> - i = 0; >> - } else { >> - i = ret; >> + /* in non-queue path, all IOs have to be completed */ >> + abort_queue(s); >> + ret = len; >> + } else if (ret == 0) { >> + goto out; > > No need for goto; just move the "for" loop inside this conditional. Or > better, just use memmove. That is: > > if (ret < 0) { > if (ret == -EAGAIN) { > return 0; > } > if (enqueue) { > return ret; > } > > abort_queue(s); > ret = len; > } > > if (ret > 0) { > memmove(...) > s->io_q.idx -= ret; > } > return ret; The above is better. >> + * update io queue, for partial completion, retry will be >> + * started automatically in following completion cb. >> + */ >> + s->io_q.idx -= ret; >> + >> return ret; >> } >> >> -static void ioq_enqueue(struct qemu_laio_state *s, struct iocb *iocb) >> +static void ioq_submit_retry(void *opaque) >> +{ >> + struct qemu_laio_state *s = opaque; >> + ioq_submit(s, false); >> +} >> + >> +static int ioq_enqueue(struct qemu_laio_state *s, struct iocb *iocb) >> { >> unsigned int idx = s->io_q.idx; >> >> + if (unlikely(idx == s->io_q.size)) { >> + return -1; > > return -EAGAIN? It means the io queue is full, so the code has to fail the current request. Thanks, Ming Lei ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] linux-aio: fix submit aio as a batch 2014-11-22 12:16 ` Ming Lei @ 2014-11-24 9:47 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-11-24 10:02 ` Ming Lei 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-11-24 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ming Lei Cc: Kevin Wolf, Peter Maydell, Benoît Canet, qemu-devel, Stefan Hajnoczi On 22/11/2014 13:16, Ming Lei wrote: > > > +static int ioq_enqueue(struct qemu_laio_state *s, struct iocb *iocb) > > > { > > > unsigned int idx = s->io_q.idx; > > > > > > + if (unlikely(idx == s->io_q.size)) { > > > + return -1; > > > > return -EAGAIN? > > It means the io queue is full, so the code has to fail the current > request. Right, but "-1" is "-EPERM" which doesn't make much sense. I think the right thing to do is to return EAGAIN, and let the owner figure it out. For example, a SCSI device might return a "BUSY" status code. Paolo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] linux-aio: fix submit aio as a batch 2014-11-24 9:47 ` Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-11-24 10:02 ` Ming Lei 2014-11-24 10:09 ` Paolo Bonzini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Ming Lei @ 2014-11-24 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Kevin Wolf, Peter Maydell, Stefan Hajnoczi, qemu-devel, Benoît Canet On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 22/11/2014 13:16, Ming Lei wrote: >> > > +static int ioq_enqueue(struct qemu_laio_state *s, struct iocb *iocb) >> > > { >> > > unsigned int idx = s->io_q.idx; >> > > >> > > + if (unlikely(idx == s->io_q.size)) { >> > > + return -1; >> > >> > return -EAGAIN? >> >> It means the io queue is full, so the code has to fail the current >> request. > > Right, but "-1" is "-EPERM" which doesn't make much sense. I think the > right thing to do is to return EAGAIN, and let the owner figure it out. > For example, a SCSI device might return a "BUSY" status code. We can do that, but laio_submit() doesn't return the code to callers. Thanks, Ming Lei ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] linux-aio: fix submit aio as a batch 2014-11-24 10:02 ` Ming Lei @ 2014-11-24 10:09 ` Paolo Bonzini 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-11-24 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ming Lei Cc: Kevin Wolf, Peter Maydell, Stefan Hajnoczi, qemu-devel, Benoît Canet On 24/11/2014 11:02, Ming Lei wrote: >> > Right, but "-1" is "-EPERM" which doesn't make much sense. I think the >> > right thing to do is to return EAGAIN, and let the owner figure it out. >> > For example, a SCSI device might return a "BUSY" status code. > We can do that, but laio_submit() doesn't return the code to callers. That can be fixed later. But not returning a sensible errno only makes things more complicated later on. Paolo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] linux-aio: handling -EAGAIN for !s->io_q.plugged case 2014-11-06 15:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] linux-aio: fix batch submission Ming Lei 2014-11-06 15:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] linux-aio: fix submit aio as a batch Ming Lei @ 2014-11-06 15:10 ` Ming Lei 2014-11-18 14:06 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-11-06 15:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] linux-aio: remove 'node' from 'struct qemu_laiocb' Ming Lei 2 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Ming Lei @ 2014-11-06 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel, Peter Maydell, Paolo Bonzini, Stefan Hajnoczi, Kevin Wolf Cc: Benoît Canet, Ming Lei Previously -EAGAIN is simply ignored for !s->io_q.plugged case, and sometimes it is easy to cause -EIO to VM, such as NVME device. This patch handles -EAGAIN by io queue for !s->io_q.plugged case, and it will be retried in following aio completion cb. Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> --- block/linux-aio.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/linux-aio.c b/block/linux-aio.c index f66e8ad..f5ca41d 100644 --- a/block/linux-aio.c +++ b/block/linux-aio.c @@ -263,6 +263,11 @@ static int ioq_enqueue(struct qemu_laio_state *s, struct iocb *iocb) s->io_q.iocbs[idx++] = iocb; s->io_q.idx = idx; + /* don't submit until next completion for -EAGAIN of non plug case */ + if (unlikely(!s->io_q.plugged)) { + return 0; + } + /* submit immediately if queue depth is above 2/3 */ if (idx > s->io_q.size * 2 / 3) { return ioq_submit(s, true); @@ -330,10 +335,25 @@ BlockAIOCB *laio_submit(BlockDriverState *bs, void *aio_ctx, int fd, io_set_eventfd(&laiocb->iocb, event_notifier_get_fd(&s->e)); if (!s->io_q.plugged) { - if (io_submit(s->ctx, 1, &iocbs) < 0) { + int ret; + + if (!s->io_q.idx) { + ret = io_submit(s->ctx, 1, &iocbs); + } else { + ret = -EAGAIN; + } + /* + * Switch to queue mode until -EAGAIN is handled, we suppose + * there is always uncompleted I/O, so try to enqueue it first, + * and will be submitted again in following aio completion cb. + */ + if (ret == -EAGAIN) { + goto enqueue; + } else if (ret < 0) { goto out_free_aiocb; } } else { + enqueue: if (ioq_enqueue(s, iocbs) < 0) { goto out_free_aiocb; } -- 1.7.9.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] linux-aio: handling -EAGAIN for !s->io_q.plugged case 2014-11-06 15:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] linux-aio: handling -EAGAIN for !s->io_q.plugged case Ming Lei @ 2014-11-18 14:06 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-11-22 12:24 ` Ming Lei 2014-11-24 9:52 ` Paolo Bonzini 0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-11-18 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ming Lei, qemu-devel, Peter Maydell, Stefan Hajnoczi, Kevin Wolf Cc: Benoît Canet On 06/11/2014 16:10, Ming Lei wrote: > + /* don't submit until next completion for -EAGAIN of non plug case */ > + if (unlikely(!s->io_q.plugged)) { > + return 0; > + } > + Is this an optimization or a fix for something? > + /* > + * Switch to queue mode until -EAGAIN is handled, we suppose > + * there is always uncompleted I/O, so try to enqueue it first, > + * and will be submitted again in following aio completion cb. > + */ > + if (ret == -EAGAIN) { > + goto enqueue; > + } else if (ret < 0) { > goto out_free_aiocb; > } Better: if (!s->io_q.plugged && !s->io_q.idx) { ret = io_submit(s->ctx, 1, &iocbs); if (ret >= 0) { return &laiocb->common; } if (ret != -EAGAIN) { goto out_free_aiocb; } } /* code for queue mode. */ Paolo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] linux-aio: handling -EAGAIN for !s->io_q.plugged case 2014-11-18 14:06 ` Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-11-22 12:24 ` Ming Lei 2014-11-24 9:52 ` Paolo Bonzini 1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Ming Lei @ 2014-11-22 12:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Kevin Wolf, Peter Maydell, Benoît Canet, qemu-devel, Stefan Hajnoczi On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 06/11/2014 16:10, Ming Lei wrote: >> + /* don't submit until next completion for -EAGAIN of non plug case */ >> + if (unlikely(!s->io_q.plugged)) { >> + return 0; >> + } >> + > > Is this an optimization or a fix for something? It is for avoiding unnecessary submission which will cause another -EAGAIN. > >> + /* >> + * Switch to queue mode until -EAGAIN is handled, we suppose >> + * there is always uncompleted I/O, so try to enqueue it first, >> + * and will be submitted again in following aio completion cb. >> + */ >> + if (ret == -EAGAIN) { >> + goto enqueue; >> + } else if (ret < 0) { >> goto out_free_aiocb; >> } > > Better: > > if (!s->io_q.plugged && !s->io_q.idx) { > ret = io_submit(s->ctx, 1, &iocbs); > if (ret >= 0) { > return &laiocb->common; > } > if (ret != -EAGAIN) { > goto out_free_aiocb; > } > } Right. Thanks, Ming Lei ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] linux-aio: handling -EAGAIN for !s->io_q.plugged case 2014-11-18 14:06 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-11-22 12:24 ` Ming Lei @ 2014-11-24 9:52 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-11-24 10:11 ` Ming Lei 1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-11-24 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ming Lei, qemu-devel, Peter Maydell, Stefan Hajnoczi, Kevin Wolf Cc: Benoît Canet On 18/11/2014 15:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> > + /* don't submit until next completion for -EAGAIN of non plug case */ >> > + if (unlikely(!s->io_q.plugged)) { >> > + return 0; >> > + } >> > + > Is this an optimization or a fix for something? Ah, if !io_q.plugged we must be in the -EAGAIN case, so no need to "submit immediately if queue depth is above 2/3". Can you rewrite the comment like this: /* This is reached in two cases: queue not plugged but io_submit * returned -EAGAIN, or queue plugged. In the latter case, start * submitting some I/O if the queue is getting too full. In the * former case, instead, wait until an I/O operation is completed. */ if (likely(idx <= s->io_q.size * 2 / 3) || unlikely(!s->io_q.plugged) { return 0; } Paolo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] linux-aio: handling -EAGAIN for !s->io_q.plugged case 2014-11-24 9:52 ` Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-11-24 10:11 ` Ming Lei 2014-11-24 10:48 ` Paolo Bonzini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Ming Lei @ 2014-11-24 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Kevin Wolf, Peter Maydell, Benoît Canet, qemu-devel, Stefan Hajnoczi On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 18/11/2014 15:06, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> > + /* don't submit until next completion for -EAGAIN of non plug case */ >>> > + if (unlikely(!s->io_q.plugged)) { >>> > + return 0; >>> > + } >>> > + >> Is this an optimization or a fix for something? > > Ah, if !io_q.plugged we must be in the -EAGAIN case, so no need to > "submit immediately if queue depth is above 2/3". Can you rewrite the The above comment is only for io_q.plugged case, and for !io_q.plugged with -EAGAIN, the requests is submitted in retry path. > comment like this: > > /* This is reached in two cases: queue not plugged but io_submit > * returned -EAGAIN, or queue plugged. In the latter case, start > * submitting some I/O if the queue is getting too full. In the > * former case, instead, wait until an I/O operation is completed. > */ > if (likely(idx <= s->io_q.size * 2 / 3) || unlikely(!s->io_q.plugged) { > return 0; > } Yes, the above change need the corresponding comment, but this patch needn't since the 1st case won't reach here, :-) Thanks, Ming Lei ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] linux-aio: handling -EAGAIN for !s->io_q.plugged case 2014-11-24 10:11 ` Ming Lei @ 2014-11-24 10:48 ` Paolo Bonzini 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-11-24 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ming Lei Cc: Kevin Wolf, Peter Maydell, Benoît Canet, qemu-devel, Stefan Hajnoczi On 24/11/2014 11:11, Ming Lei wrote: > Yes, the above change need the corresponding comment, but this > patch needn't since the 1st case won't reach here, :-) I'm not sure I follow, but you can send v4 with a clearer comment I guess. :) Paolo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] linux-aio: remove 'node' from 'struct qemu_laiocb' 2014-11-06 15:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] linux-aio: fix batch submission Ming Lei 2014-11-06 15:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] linux-aio: fix submit aio as a batch Ming Lei 2014-11-06 15:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] linux-aio: handling -EAGAIN for !s->io_q.plugged case Ming Lei @ 2014-11-06 15:10 ` Ming Lei 2014-11-18 14:06 ` Paolo Bonzini 2 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Ming Lei @ 2014-11-06 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel, Peter Maydell, Paolo Bonzini, Stefan Hajnoczi, Kevin Wolf Cc: Benoît Canet, Ming Lei No one uses the 'node' field any more, so remove it from 'struct qemu_laiocb', and this can save 16byte for the struct on 64bit arch. Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> --- block/linux-aio.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/block/linux-aio.c b/block/linux-aio.c index f5ca41d..b12da25 100644 --- a/block/linux-aio.c +++ b/block/linux-aio.c @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ struct qemu_laiocb { size_t nbytes; QEMUIOVector *qiov; bool is_read; - QLIST_ENTRY(qemu_laiocb) node; }; /* -- 1.7.9.5 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] linux-aio: remove 'node' from 'struct qemu_laiocb' 2014-11-06 15:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] linux-aio: remove 'node' from 'struct qemu_laiocb' Ming Lei @ 2014-11-18 14:06 ` Paolo Bonzini 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-11-18 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ming Lei, qemu-devel, Peter Maydell, Stefan Hajnoczi, Kevin Wolf Cc: Benoît Canet On 06/11/2014 16:10, Ming Lei wrote: > No one uses the 'node' field any more, so remove it > from 'struct qemu_laiocb', and this can save 16byte > for the struct on 64bit arch. > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> > --- > block/linux-aio.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/block/linux-aio.c b/block/linux-aio.c > index f5ca41d..b12da25 100644 > --- a/block/linux-aio.c > +++ b/block/linux-aio.c > @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ struct qemu_laiocb { > size_t nbytes; > QEMUIOVector *qiov; > bool is_read; > - QLIST_ENTRY(qemu_laiocb) node; > }; > > /* > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-24 10:48 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-11-06 15:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] linux-aio: fix batch submission Ming Lei 2014-11-06 15:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] linux-aio: fix submit aio as a batch Ming Lei 2014-11-18 14:18 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-11-22 12:16 ` Ming Lei 2014-11-24 9:47 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-11-24 10:02 ` Ming Lei 2014-11-24 10:09 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-11-06 15:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] linux-aio: handling -EAGAIN for !s->io_q.plugged case Ming Lei 2014-11-18 14:06 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-11-22 12:24 ` Ming Lei 2014-11-24 9:52 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-11-24 10:11 ` Ming Lei 2014-11-24 10:48 ` Paolo Bonzini 2014-11-06 15:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] linux-aio: remove 'node' from 'struct qemu_laiocb' Ming Lei 2014-11-18 14:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).