From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45506) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnsJn-0001fD-4q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:00:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnsJh-00007H-0H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:59:55 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49589) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XnsJg-000077-Ol for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:59:48 -0500 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sAAGxk9Q001889 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:59:47 -0500 From: Max Reitz Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:59:42 +0100 Message-Id: <1415638784-32311-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] block: Improve filename generation for blkdebug List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Kevin Wolf , Fam Zheng , Stefan Hajnoczi , Max Reitz This is technically a v2 to "block: Fix filename generation for blkdebug and nbd" which contained a fix for the NBD filename generation, which has been merged into master by now. The rest, however, has not been yet, due to lack of reviews. Instead of pinging an old series with an already merged patch I'm therefore just resending the remaining two patches with this nice inciting cover letter which really, really makes you want to review the patches because they are so lovely. I don't want to say good, because I know my patches, but you want to review them either way because you can't stand the excitement to know what's in them. There is only one way of ever finding out: Review them! It'll bring great joy and maybe even glory! Also, if you don't review them and I have to send a v3, I'll attach a picture of a really cute kitten and tell you that this kitten will cry really badly if you don't adopt these patches. After another month, I will send a picture of a crying kitten. So you better review this version. git-backport-diff against v1: Key: [----] : patches are identical [####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream patch [down] : patch is downstream-only The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, respectively 001/2:[----] [--] 'blkdebug: Simplify and improve filename generation' 002/2:[----] [--] 'iotests: Plain blkdebug filename generation' Max Reitz (2): blkdebug: Simplify and improve filename generation iotests: Plain blkdebug filename generation block/blkdebug.c | 98 +++++++++++++--------------------------------- tests/qemu-iotests/099 | 9 ++++- tests/qemu-iotests/099.out | 8 +++- 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-) -- 1.9.3