From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] exec: Handle multipage ranges in invalidate_and_set_dirty()
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 19:44:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1416167061-13203-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> (raw)
The code in invalidate_and_set_dirty() needs to handle addr/length
combinations which cross guest physical page boundaries. This can happen,
for example, when disk I/O reads large blocks into guest RAM which previously
held code that we have cached translations for. Unfortunately we were only
checking the clean/dirty status of the first page in the range, and then
were calling a tb_invalidate function which only handles ranges that don't
cross page boundaries. Fix the function to deal with multipage ranges.
The symptoms of this bug were that guest code would misbehave (eg segfault),
in particular after a guest reboot but potentially any time the guest
reused a page of its physical RAM for new code.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
This seems pretty nasty, and I have no idea why it hasn't been wreaking
more havoc than this before. I'm not entirely sure why we invalidate TBs
if any of the dirty bits is set rather than only if the code bit is set,
but I left that logic as it is.
Review appreciated -- it would be nice to get this into rc2 if
we can, I think.
exec.c | 6 ++----
include/exec/ram_addr.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
index 759055d..f0e2bd3 100644
--- a/exec.c
+++ b/exec.c
@@ -2066,10 +2066,8 @@ int cpu_memory_rw_debug(CPUState *cpu, target_ulong addr,
static void invalidate_and_set_dirty(hwaddr addr,
hwaddr length)
{
- if (cpu_physical_memory_is_clean(addr)) {
- /* invalidate code */
- tb_invalidate_phys_page_range(addr, addr + length, 0);
- /* set dirty bit */
+ if (cpu_physical_memory_range_includes_clean(addr, length)) {
+ tb_invalidate_phys_range(addr, addr + length, 0);
cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range_nocode(addr, length);
}
xen_modified_memory(addr, length);
diff --git a/include/exec/ram_addr.h b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
index cf1d4c7..8fc75cd 100644
--- a/include/exec/ram_addr.h
+++ b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
@@ -49,6 +49,21 @@ static inline bool cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty(ram_addr_t start,
return next < end;
}
+static inline bool cpu_physical_memory_get_clean(ram_addr_t start,
+ ram_addr_t length,
+ unsigned client)
+{
+ unsigned long end, page, next;
+
+ assert(client < DIRTY_MEMORY_NUM);
+
+ end = TARGET_PAGE_ALIGN(start + length) >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
+ page = start >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
+ next = find_next_zero_bit(ram_list.dirty_memory[client], end, page);
+
+ return next < end;
+}
+
static inline bool cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty_flag(ram_addr_t addr,
unsigned client)
{
@@ -64,6 +79,16 @@ static inline bool cpu_physical_memory_is_clean(ram_addr_t addr)
return !(vga && code && migration);
}
+static inline bool cpu_physical_memory_range_includes_clean(ram_addr_t start,
+ ram_addr_t length)
+{
+ bool vga = cpu_physical_memory_get_clean(start, length, DIRTY_MEMORY_VGA);
+ bool code = cpu_physical_memory_get_clean(start, length, DIRTY_MEMORY_CODE);
+ bool migration =
+ cpu_physical_memory_get_clean(start, length, DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION);
+ return vga || code || migration;
+}
+
static inline void cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_flag(ram_addr_t addr,
unsigned client)
{
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2014-11-16 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-16 19:44 Peter Maydell [this message]
2014-11-17 11:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] exec: Handle multipage ranges in invalidate_and_set_dirty() Paolo Bonzini
2014-11-18 11:12 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1416167061-13203-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--to=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).